From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3x6Th02TkXzDq66 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:33:19 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys To: Ram Pai , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <1499289735-14220-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1499289735-14220-37-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:33:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1499289735-14220-37-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/05/2017 02:22 PM, Ram Pai wrote: > Abstracted out the arch specific code into the header file, and > added powerpc specific changes. > > a) added 4k-backed hpte, memory allocator, powerpc specific. > b) added three test case where the key is associated after the page is > accessed/allocated/mapped. > c) cleaned up the code to make checkpatch.pl happy There's a *lot* of churn here. If it breaks, I'm going to have a heck of a time figuring out which hunk broke. Is there any way to break this up into a series of things that we have a chance at bisecting?