From: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: tyreld@linux.ibm.com, ldufour@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] powerpc/rtas: improve function information lookups
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:32:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c183a039-2001-eb3a-7028-f8a0813987cf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b4c4316bfe88a3f231ffe416ce34192189549db.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 11/22/22 20:51, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 09:07 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> +enum rtas_function_flags {
>> + RTAS_FN_FLAG_BANNED_FOR_SYSCALL_ON_LE = (1 << 0),
>> +};
>
> This seems to be new, what's the justification?
>
Seems to be a run-time replacement of:
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
{ "ibm,suspend-me", -1, -1, -1, -1, -1 },
{ "ibm,update-nodes", -1, 0, -1, -1, -1, 4096 },
{ "ibm,update-properties", -1, 0, -1, -1, -1, 4096 },
#endif
It looks to be handled logically:
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) &&
+ (func->flags & RTAS_FN_FLAG_BANNED_FOR_SYSCALL_ON_LE))
+ goto err;
Perhaps, also allow the addition of any future special cases
for rtas functions easier to maintain?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 15:07 [PATCH 00/13] RTAS maintenance Nathan Lynch
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/rtas: document rtas_call() Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 2:46 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] powerpc/rtasd: use correct OF API for event scan rate Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 2:39 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] powerpc/rtas: avoid device tree lookups in rtas_os_term() Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 3:03 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-28 18:08 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-28 2:29 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-28 18:26 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-29 6:45 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-29 15:37 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] powerpc/rtas: avoid scheduling " Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 3:17 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-28 2:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] powerpc/pseries/eeh: use correct API for error log size Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 3:21 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-28 20:22 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] powerpc/rtas: clean up rtas_error_log_max initialization Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 3:40 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] powerpc/rtas: clean up includes Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 4:45 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] powerpc/rtas: define pr_fmt and convert printk call sites Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 4:07 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] powerpc/rtas: mandate RTAS syscall filtering Nathan Lynch
2022-11-22 4:20 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] powerpc/rtas: improve function information lookups Nathan Lynch
2022-11-23 2:51 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-23 19:32 ` Nick Child [this message]
2022-11-24 3:28 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-28 21:19 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-29 0:08 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-29 7:23 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-29 15:33 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-23 20:06 ` Nick Child
2022-11-28 21:57 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] powerpc/rtas: strengthen do_enter_rtas() type safety, drop inline Nathan Lynch
2022-11-23 3:23 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-28 2:37 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] powerpc/tracing: tracepoints for RTAS entry and exit Nathan Lynch
2022-11-28 2:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-18 15:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] powerpc/rtas: place tracepoints in do_enter_rtas() Nathan Lynch
2022-11-28 3:07 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-28 23:44 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-29 0:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-11-29 20:24 ` Nathan Lynch
2022-11-30 7:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-11-29 6:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-12-08 12:40 ` [PATCH 00/13] RTAS maintenance Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c183a039-2001-eb3a-7028-f8a0813987cf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).