From: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
To: mohan@in.ibm.com
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 04:43:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1b8d82c8241fc3750c1339c34ecc799@bga.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070604105455.GA4916@in.ibm.com>
On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:54 AM, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> Milton,
>
> How about this patch?
I'd make a few minor changes (see below), but I'll ack it.
I've checked it compiles and boots but not the server selection.
> =============================================================
> In some of the PPC970 based systems, interrupt would be distributed to
> offline cpus also even when booted with "maxcpus=1". So check whether
> cpu online map and cpu present map are equal or not. If they are equal
> default_distrib_server is used as interrupt server otherwise boot cpu
> (default_server) used as interrupt server.
>
> In addition to this, if an interrupt is assigned to a specific cpu (ie
> smp affinity) and if that cpu is not online, the earlier code used to
> return the default_distrib_server as interrupt server. This patch
> introduces an additional paramter to the get_irq function ie
> strict_check, based on this parameter, if the cpu is not online either
> default_distrib_server or -1 is returned.
>
> Cc: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
> Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
Acked-By: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
> @@ -166,22 +166,24 @@ static int get_irq_server(unsigned int v
> if (!distribute_irqs)
> return default_server;
>
> - if (cpus_equal(cpumask, CPU_MASK_ALL)) {
> - server = default_distrib_server;
> - } else {
> + if (!cpus_equal(cpumask, CPU_MASK_ALL)) {
> cpus_and(tmp, cpu_online_map, cpumask);
>
> - if (cpus_empty(tmp))
> - server = default_distrib_server;
> - else
> - server = get_hard_smp_processor_id(first_cpu(tmp));
> - }
> + server = first_cpu(tmp);
>
> - return server;
> + if (server < NR_CPUS)
> + return get_hard_smp_processor_id(server);
> + else if (strict_check)
> + return -1;
The indent on the return is 1 tab too many.
See next comment.
> + }
>
> + if (cpus_equal(cpu_online_map, cpu_present_map))
> + return default_distrib_server;
> + else
> + return default_server;
I'd actually remove both occurrences of "else" bringing this and the
previous return back a tabstop. The else is unnecessary because the if
statement is return . (Seperate the new if from the previous with a
blank line in both cases).
> }
> #else
> -static int get_irq_server(unsigned int virq)
> +static int get_irq_server(unsigned int virq, unsigned int
> strict_check)
> {
> return default_server;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-06 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-08 4:55 [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970 Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18 5:14 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 10:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 11:42 ` [Fastboot] " Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 15:07 ` Doug Maxey
2007-03-06 13:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 14:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 16:55 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 17:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-07 4:53 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 10:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-09 8:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 7:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-10 12:54 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 16:59 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-11 1:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-19 11:52 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-20 5:45 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-26 9:24 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-26 14:42 ` Milton Miller
2007-05-03 14:47 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-06 6:52 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-04 10:54 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-06 9:43 ` Milton Miller [this message]
2007-06-06 11:31 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-11 1:58 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-11 18:07 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-12 14:51 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-15 16:35 ` Milton Miller
2007-03-07 6:06 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-07 10:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 22:05 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-03-07 5:01 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-07 9:10 ` Mohan Kumar M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1b8d82c8241fc3750c1339c34ecc799@bga.com \
--to=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).