Re: [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/rtas: fix miswording in rtas_function kerneldoc

[Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:33 -0600, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> The 'filter' member is a pointer, not a bool; fix the wording
> accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> index c73b01d722f6..c29c38b1a55a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct rtas_filter {
>   *                            functions are believed to have no
> users on
>   *                            ppc64le, and we want to keep it that
> way. It does
>   *                            not make sense for this to be set when
> @filter
> - *                            is false.
> + *                            is NULL.
>   */
>  struct rtas_function {
>         s32 token;
> 

-- 
Andrew Donnellan    OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@linux.ibm.com   IBM Australia Limited