From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bw0-f10.google.com (mail-bw0-f10.google.com [209.85.218.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42052DDE06 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:22:37 +1100 (EST) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5819033bwz.9 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:22:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:22:04 +0100 From: "Leon Woestenberg" To: "Felix Radensky" Subject: Re: Long boot delay on 460EX with 2.6.28-rc8 In-Reply-To: <21102440.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <21070179.post@talk.nabble.com> <20081218190208.GC18201@yoda.jdub.homelinux.org> <21087072.post@talk.nabble.com> <200812190856.19482.sr@denx.de> <494C10EE.1040305@embedded-sol.com> <20081220003704.26bfb042@lappy.seanm.ca> <21102440.post@talk.nabble.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Felix, On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Felix Radensky wrote: > > I've found the cause of the delay. It was a stupid error on my part, not > related to ndfc driver, which is fine. Thanks a lot for you work on this. > Could you share the error?* (I'm sure I can easily exceed your level of stupidity) It helps people who are curiously following the thread (either now or in two years time, hi there!) learn if it matches their problem. > I apologize for the noise. > Apologies not required. Regards, -- Leon * unless of course, it was really really really stupid in the first place and will cost you your daytime job. Then you are excused.