From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, willy@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.or
Subject: Re: [v1 0/5] parallelized "struct page" zeroing
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:47:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c399ad8b-32d8-09d7-bb47-dd6bc528b133@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170323.163520.123614131649571916.davem@davemloft.net>
On 03/23/2017 07:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:26:38 -0700
>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:01:48PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>>> When deferred struct page initialization feature is enabled, we get a
>>> performance gain of initializing vmemmap in parallel after other CPUs are
>>> started. However, we still zero the memory for vmemmap using one boot CPU.
>>> This patch-set fixes the memset-zeroing limitation by deferring it as well.
>>>
>>> Here is example performance gain on SPARC with 32T:
>>> base
>>> https://hastebin.com/ozanelatat.go
>>>
>>> fix
>>> https://hastebin.com/utonawukof.go
>>>
>>> As you can see without the fix it takes: 97.89s to boot
>>> With the fix it takes: 46.91 to boot.
>>
>> How long does it take if we just don't zero this memory at all? We seem
>> to be initialising most of struct page in __init_single_page(), so it
>> seems like a lot of additional complexity to conditionally zero the rest
>> of struct page.
>
> Alternatively, just zero out the entire vmemmap area when it is setup
> in the kernel page tables.
Hi Dave,
I can do this, either way is fine with me. It would be a little slower
compared to the current approach where we benefit from having memset()
to work as prefetch. But that would become negligible, once in the
future we will increase the granularity of multi-threading, currently it
is only one thread per-mnode to multithread vmemamp. Your call.
Thank you,
Pasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 23:01 [v1 0/5] parallelized "struct page" zeroing Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 1/5] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 2/5] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 3/5] mm: add "zero" argument to vmemmap allocators Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 4/5] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 5/5] mm: teach platforms not to zero struct pages memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:26 ` [v1 0/5] parallelized "struct page" zeroing Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-23 23:35 ` David Miller
2017-03-23 23:47 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2017-03-24 1:15 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:36 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-03-24 8:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-03-24 9:35 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c399ad8b-32d8-09d7-bb47-dd6bc528b133@oracle.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.or \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).