From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Cc: brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ibmvfc: fix invalid sub-CRQ handles after hard reset
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:13:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e0c5db-2743-ea2e-8dd4-6dc4bdc9d572@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225214237.22400-3-tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/25/21 1:42 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> A hard reset results in a complete transport disconnect such that the
> CRQ connection with the partner VIOS is broken. This has the side effect
> of also invalidating the associated sub-CRQs. The current code assumes
> that the sub-CRQs are perserved resulting in a protocol violation after
> trying to reconnect them with the VIOS. This introduces an infinite loop
> such that the VIOS forces a disconnect after each subsequent attempt to
> re-register with invalid handles.
>
> Avoid the aforementioned issue by releasing the sub-CRQs prior to CRQ
> disconnect, and driving a reinitialization of the sub-CRQs once a new
> CRQ is registered with the hypervisor.
>
> fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels")
> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> index 384960036f8b..2cca55f2e464 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static void ibmvfc_npiv_logout(struct ibmvfc_host *);
> static void ibmvfc_tgt_implicit_logout_and_del(struct ibmvfc_target *);
> static void ibmvfc_tgt_move_login(struct ibmvfc_target *);
>
> +static void ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *);
> +static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *);
> +
> static const char *unknown_error = "unknown error";
>
> static long h_reg_sub_crq(unsigned long unit_address, unsigned long ioba,
> @@ -926,8 +929,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> unsigned long flags;
> struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev);
> struct ibmvfc_queue *crq = &vhost->crq;
> - struct ibmvfc_queue *scrq;
> - int i;
> +
> + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost);
>
> /* Close the CRQ */
> do {
> @@ -936,6 +939,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_CRQ, vdev->unit_address);
> } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc));
>
> + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost);
This has the same issue as patch 5 in that if fail to set up sub-crqs do_enquiry
will be set to zero, but the locked code region below will then flip it back to
one which we don't want.
-T
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
> spin_lock(vhost->crq.q_lock);
> vhost->state = IBMVFC_NO_CRQ;
> @@ -947,16 +952,6 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> memset(crq->msgs.crq, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> crq->cur = 0;
>
> - if (vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) {
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_scsi_hw_queues; i++) {
> - scrq = &vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs[i];
> - spin_lock(scrq->q_lock);
> - memset(scrq->msgs.scrq, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> - scrq->cur = 0;
> - spin_unlock(scrq->q_lock);
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* And re-open it again */
> rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_REG_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> crq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -966,6 +961,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Partner adapter not ready\n");
> else if (rc != 0)
> dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Couldn't register crq (rc=%d)\n", rc);
> +
> spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -5692,6 +5688,7 @@ static void ibmvfc_deregister_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, int index)
>
> free_irq(scrq->irq, scrq);
> irq_dispose_mapping(scrq->irq);
> + scrq->irq = 0;
>
> do {
> rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 21:42 [PATCH v3 0/5] ibmvfc: hard reset fixes Tyrel Datwyler
2021-02-25 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ibmvfc: simplify handling of sub-CRQ initialization Tyrel Datwyler
2021-02-25 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ibmvfc: fix invalid sub-CRQ handles after hard reset Tyrel Datwyler
2021-02-25 22:13 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2021-02-25 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ibmvfc: treat H_CLOSED as success during sub-CRQ registration Tyrel Datwyler
2021-02-25 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ibmvfc: store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup Tyrel Datwyler
2021-02-25 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ibmvfc: reinitialize sub-CRQs and perform channel enquiry after LPM Tyrel Datwyler
2021-02-25 22:12 ` Tyrel Datwyler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e0c5db-2743-ea2e-8dd4-6dc4bdc9d572@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).