From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEACD39410 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 11:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fmg8n2DDDz2yks; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:48:09 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=113.46.200.221 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1775130489; cv=none; b=RH22HiL+XV1Q7/bUXIYeneE/x55OWSvh9g2h4TocbF4ClELzwmM8SG+eWibDGDOh+R5aoXKWZXC4kbG1H3Z+YSYPs+VKaMhoqp4fEumrl1K1ZJffx9Zu/R/VChCaNqvG/yIg1PL0+5S67PNzddGeloUfGUMdQXSnPCEJ2Tr1frOt8QeNsWF0vLP4xyf4x2QQ+EYV0E2F5enA9kiEEtjUCLElHDXGIvo+RtrD2ssYZs/wQ33YcaqM+LrEw4yR3YmnHSAxBVrEMKDRvbiisPYCA9pi9pni6rLl9/NsgAO/m10/NuHPj98vNWpl6tWxOV3/N12FAVI905phkqKIS/CDbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1775130489; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=o0BfAq2trtfASNnVxf9HHtrEQCspzeSBvKkdxZfJnW4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=lnp5y/IDnmfThXYPl3W3AFNRw6BDtHrTO29S4h//SqjebduveznbIbT9T94Cgi8nM7EDrM7EupAi0Rr3CZf+hiB/rF6kNEWuW1TWskrg7Xvl0tWVrpT9fwqOElbHTZDWKGM/IuhPC6jWVJBviDzlp9mdEodP1cdO42qf2ktQIkKcio/jGCtaHdcSPjMILkErRFfmTcao4SbWeNDTyRD/Arg5ix1eqLoy5RNihVoKH1c1hcuAbr5aGYX0cfxaUUn4CyDlSXFRo5r6WsaPYZCKpmMCFwAOt0oevTgZwBVFeVQgaUFovKRhomx4omT1yTulLwcvSHXNLIfg+QPwQ+hjKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=Luc54heS; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=113.46.200.221; helo=canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=Luc54heS; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=113.46.200.221; helo=canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.221]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fmg8k0htdz2yhP for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:48:03 +1100 (AEDT) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=o0BfAq2trtfASNnVxf9HHtrEQCspzeSBvKkdxZfJnW4=; b=Luc54heStVP+Ks1cf/+9Mie8Lxo+t9KmOQfujBmJXRPKkSvo/HJW2BgtlkbawbWBfCN9tRiOC MhfDfIGw5pwHoccffo+jZsj9vgYRqDLMIwGS/b1ztYLuinQEB7Mzu9JGS+etuJoT2GPKebOkefi 174duOCnXseF0u2OAWDwFu0= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.223]) by canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4fmg1R065LzRhSg; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 19:41:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771BE40561; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 19:47:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 19:47:55 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 19:47:53 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/15] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation Content-Language: en-US To: Borislav Petkov CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20260402072701.628293-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20260402113137.GAac5Tmc5b7SL98KdY@fat_crate.local> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: <20260402113137.GAac5Tmc5b7SL98KdY@fat_crate.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.109.254] X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) On 2026/4/2 19:31, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >> The crash memory allocation, and the exclude of crashk_res, crashk_low_res >> and crashk_cma memory are almost identical across different architectures, >> This patch set handle them in crash core in a general way, which eliminate >> a lot of duplication code. > > From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > > "Don't get discouraged - or impatient > ------------------------------------ > > After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are > busy people and may not get to your patch right away. > > Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment, > but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should > receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure > that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > busy times like merge windows." > > You need to be patient and send once a week and not spam people: Thank you for the reminder and for your patience. I apologize for the frequent updates; I am becoming more familiar with the community's workflow. I will follow your advice, limit my follow-ups to once a week, and avoid resending during busy periods like the merge window. I'll wait for further feedback before taking the next step. > > Feb 04 Jinjie Ruan ( :1.0K|) [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Feb 09 Jinjie Ruan ( :1.5K|) [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Feb 12 Jinjie Ruan ( :2.1K|) [PATCH v5 0/4] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Feb 24 Jinjie Ruan ( :2.3K|) [PATCH v6 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Feb 26 Jinjie Ruan ( :2.5K|) [PATCH v7 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Mar 02 Jinjie Ruan ( :2.8K|) [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Mar 23 Jinjie Ruan ( :2.9K|) [PATCH v9 0/5] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Mar 25 Jinjie Ruan ( :3.7K|) [PATCH v10 0/8] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Mar 28 Jinjie Ruan ( :4.3K|) [PATCH v11 00/11] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > Apr 02 Jinjie Ruan ( :4.5K|) [PATCH v12 00/15] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation >