linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: Support empty section from recent binutils
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:51:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c81c544f-96d7-139f-4583-824f4791e162@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPK8XcM9LAWrc-eiir5gUN0Vb2Ca_ZMR-xF1Z_FoyWK8eqYbA@mail.gmail.com>



Le 29/03/2022 à 00:31, Joel Stanley a écrit :
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 22:43, Christophe Leroy
> <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 29/11/2021 à 18:43, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
>>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:43:23 +0000
>>> LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 24/11/2021 à 15:43, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>>>> Looks like recent binutils (2.36 and over ?) may empty some section,
>>>>> leading to failure like:
>>>>>
>>>>>      Cannot find symbol for section 11: .text.unlikely.
>>>>>      kernel/kexec_file.o: failed
>>>>>      make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:287: kernel/kexec_file.o] Error 1
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to avoid that, ensure that the section has a content before
>>>>> returning it's name in has_rel_mcount().
>>>>
>>>> This patch doesn't work, on PPC32 I get the following message with this
>>>> patch applied:
>>>>
>>>> [    0.000000] ftrace: No functions to be traced?
>>>>
>>>> Without the patch I get:
>>>>
>>>> [    0.000000] ftrace: allocating 22381 entries in 66 pages
>>>> [    0.000000] ftrace: allocated 66 pages with 2 groups
>>>
>>> Because of this report, I have not applied this patch (even though I was
>>> about to push it to Linus).
>>>
>>> I'm pulling it from my queue until this gets resolved.
>>>
>>
>> I have no idea on how to fix that for the moment.
>>
>> With GCC 10 (binutils 2.36) an objdump -x on kernel/kexec_file.o gives:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 l    d  .text.unlikely 0000000000000000 .text.unlikely
>> 0000000000000000  w    F .text.unlikely 0000000000000038
>> .arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add
>> 0000000000000038  w    F .text.unlikely 0000000000000038
>> .arch_kexec_apply_relocations
>>
>>
>> With GCC 11 (binutils 2.37) the same gives:
>>
>> 0000000000000000  w    F .text.unlikely 0000000000000038
>> .arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add
>> 0000000000000038  w    F .text.unlikely 0000000000000038
>> .arch_kexec_apply_relocations
>>
>>
>> The problem is that recordmcount drops weak symbols, and it doesn't find
>> any non-weak symbol in .text.unlikely
>>
>> Explication given at
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.16-rc2/source/scripts/recordmcount.h#L506
>>
>> I have no idea on what to do.
> 
> Did you end up finding a solution for this issue?
> 

Not really, my solution was to switch to the kernel compiler at 
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ which embeds 
binutils 2.36

But it looks like using objtool instead of recordmcount doesn't exhibit 
the problem.

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220318105140.43914-4-sv@linux.ibm.com/

Christophe

      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24 14:43 [PATCH] recordmcount: Support empty section from recent binutils Christophe Leroy
2021-11-26  8:43 ` LEROY Christophe
2021-11-29 17:43   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-29 17:56     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-28 22:31       ` Joel Stanley
2022-03-30  9:51         ` Christophe Leroy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c81c544f-96d7-139f-4583-824f4791e162@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).