linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "jniethe5@gmail.com" <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"ajd@linux.ibm.com" <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
	"cmr@bluescreens.de" <cmr@bluescreens.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] powerpc/tlb: Add local flush for page given mm_struct and psize
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:58:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd76d514a59088706721bbd3817b0ae664751acc.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2d1c870311672650798c0e7eee5532b505a0176.camel@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 11:39 +1100, Benjamin Gray wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 09:56 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > By the way, 'extern' keyword is pointless and deprecated for
> > functions 
> > prototypes, please don't add new ones, even if other historical 
> > prototypes have one.
> 
> This and the above commented parts match the style of the surrounding
> implementations. For example,
> 
>         static inline void local_flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>         {
>                 if (radix_enabled())
>                         return radix__local_flush_tlb_mm(mm);
>                 return hash__local_flush_tlb_mm(mm);
>         }
> 
> I am not going to add code that is inconsistent with the surrounding
> code. That just causes confusion later down the line when readers
> wonder why this function is special compared to the others. If it
> needs
> to use modern style, then I would be happy to include a patch that
> modernises the surrounding code first.
> 
> Though why the hash__* functions are empty I'm not sure... If they
> were
> not implemented I would have expected a BUILD_BUG(). If they are
> unnecessary due to hash itself, it's odd that they exist (as you
> point
> out for the new one).

From what I can see in the history, the empty hash functions were
originally introduced as 64-bit compatibility definitions for the hash
MMU (which I guess doesn't require any action). These empty functions
were shuffled around, then eventually prefixed with hash__* to make way
for the radix variants, which are hidden behind a generic
'local_flush_tlb_mm' etc. implementation as we see today. So basically,
the empty hash__* functions no longer (never, really) served a purpose
once the generic wrapper was added. I'll add a patch to delete them and
clean up the return voids.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-07  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25  4:44 [PATCH v9 0/7] Use per-CPU temporary mappings for patching on Radix MMU Benjamin Gray
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] powerpc: Allow clearing and restoring registers independent of saved breakpoint state Benjamin Gray
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] powerpc/code-patching: Handle RWX patching initialisation error Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02  9:36   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-02 22:37     ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] powerpc/code-patching: Use WARN_ON and fix check in poking_init Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02  9:38   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-02 22:42     ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] powerpc/code-patching: Verify instruction patch succeeded Benjamin Gray
2022-10-26  0:47   ` Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02  9:43   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-02 10:13     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-02 23:02       ` Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02 22:58     ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] powerpc/tlb: Add local flush for page given mm_struct and psize Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02  9:56   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-03  0:39     ` Benjamin Gray
2022-11-03  0:45       ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-11-07  6:58       ` Benjamin Gray [this message]
2022-11-07 12:28         ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] powerpc/code-patching: Use temporary mm for Radix MMU Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02 10:11   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-03  3:10     ` Benjamin Gray
2022-11-08  5:16       ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-25  4:44 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] powerpc/code-patching: Consolidate and cache per-cpu patching context Benjamin Gray
2022-11-02 10:17   ` Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd76d514a59088706721bbd3817b0ae664751acc.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=cmr@bluescreens.de \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).