LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>,
	"Sean C. Dardis" <sean.c.dardis@intel.com>,
	Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI/AER: Allow drivers to opt in to Bus Reset on Non-Fatal Errors
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:01:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd952c82-9f8b-4396-9170-b34d539a8fac@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28fd805043bb57af390168d05abb30898cf4fc58.1755008151.git.lukas@wunner.de>



On 8/12/25 10:11 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> When Advanced Error Reporting was introduced in September 2006 by commit
> 6c2b374d7485 ("PCI-Express AER implemetation: AER core and aerdriver"), it
> sought to adhere to the recovery flow and callbacks specified in
> Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst.
>
> That document had been added in January 2006, when Enhanced Error Handling
> (EEH) was introduced for PowerPC with commit 065c6359071c ("[PATCH] PCI
> Error Recovery: documentation").
>
> However the AER driver deviates from the document in that it never
> performs a Secondary Bus Reset on Non-Fatal Errors, but always on Fatal
> Errors.  By contrast, EEH allows drivers to opt in or out of a Bus Reset
> regardless of error severity, by returning PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET or
> PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER from their ->error_detected() callback.  If all
> drivers agree that they can recover without a Bus Reset, EEH skips it.
> Should one of them request a Bus Reset, it overrides all other drivers.
>
> This inconsistency between EEH and AER seems problematic because drivers
> need to be aware of and cope with it.
>
> The file Documentation/PCI/pcieaer-howto.rst hints at a rationale for
> always performing a Bus Reset on Fatal Errors:  "Fatal errors [...] cause
> the link to be unreliable.  [...] This [reset_link] callback is used to
> reset the PCIe physical link when a fatal error happens.  If an error
> message indicates a fatal error, [...] performing link reset at upstream
> is necessary."

In the code we don't seem to differentiate link_reset and slot_reset. But
the Documentation calls them into two steps. Do you think we should
fix the Documentation?

> There's no such rationale provided for never performing a Bus Reset on
> Non-Fatal Errors.
>
> The "xe" driver has a need to attempt a reset of local units on graphics
> cards upon a Non-Fatal Error.  If that is insufficient for recovery, the
> driver wants to opt in to a Bus Reset.
>
> Accommodate such use cases and align AER more closely with EEH by
> performing a Bus Reset in pcie_do_recovery() if drivers request it and the
> faulting device's channel_state is pci_channel_io_normal.  The AER driver
> sets this channel_state for Non-Fatal Errors.  For Fatal Errors, it uses
> pci_channel_io_frozen.
>
> This limits the deviation from Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst
> and EEH to the unconditional Bus Reset on Fatal Errors.
>
> pcie_do_recovery() is also invoked by the Downstream Port Containment and
> Error Disconnect Recover drivers.  They both set the channel_state to
> pci_channel_io_frozen, hence pcie_do_recovery() continues to always invoke
> the ->reset_subordinates() callback in their case.  That is necessary
> because the callback brings the link back up at the containing Downstream
> Port.
>
> There are two behavioral changes resulting from this commit:
>
> First, if channel_state is pci_channel_io_normal and one of the affected
> drivers returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET from its ->error_detected()
> callback, a Bus Reset will now be performed.  There are drivers doing this
> and although it would be possible to avoid a behavioral change by letting
> them return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER instead, the impression I got from
> examination of all drivers is that they actually expect or want a Bus
> Reset (cxl_error_detected() is a case in point).  In any case, if they can
> cope with a Bus Reset on Fatal Errors, they shouldn't have issues with a
> Bus Reset on Non-Fatal Errors.
>
> Second, if channel_state is pci_channel_io_frozen and all affected drivers
> return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER from ->error_detected(), their
> ->mmio_enabled() callback is now invoked prior to performing a Bus Reset,
> instead of afterwards.  This actually makes sense:  For example,
> drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c dumps debug registers in its
> ->mmio_enabled() callback.  Doing so after reset right now captures the
> post-reset state instead of the faulting state, which is useless.
>
> There is only one other driver which implements ->mmio_enabled() and
> returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER from ->error_detected() for
> channel_state pci_channel_io_frozen, drivers/scsi/ipr.c (IBM Power RAID).
> It appears to only be used on EEH platforms.  So the second behavioral
> change is limited to these two drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index de6381c690f5..e795e5ae6b03 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -217,15 +217,10 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>   	pci_walk_bridge(bridge, pci_pm_runtime_get_sync, NULL);
>   
>   	pci_dbg(bridge, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
> -	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
> +	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen)
>   		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_frozen_detected, &status);
> -		if (reset_subordinates(bridge) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> -			pci_warn(bridge, "subordinate device reset failed\n");
> -			goto failed;
> -		}
> -	} else {
> +	else
>   		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_normal_detected, &status);
> -	}
>   
>   	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) {
>   		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> @@ -233,6 +228,14 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>   		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_mmio_enabled, &status);
>   	}
>   
> +	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET ||
> +	    state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {

Why not let report_frozen_detected() update status to
PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET?

For fatal errors, I believe most driver callbacks already return
PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET by default. Even if that’s not always the case,
since a reset is required anyway, it might make more sense to update the
status there.If you do it, you can skip the above check.
> +		if (reset_subordinates(bridge) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> +			pci_warn(bridge, "subordinate device reset failed\n");
> +			goto failed;
> +		}
> +	}

For pci_channel_io_frozen,
> +
>   	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) {
>   		/*
>   		 * TODO: Should call platform-specific

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer



  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13  5:11 [PATCH 0/5] PCI: Reduce AER / EEH deviations Lukas Wunner
2025-08-13  5:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI/AER: Allow drivers to opt in to Bus Reset on Non-Fatal Errors Lukas Wunner
2025-08-13 23:01   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy [this message]
2025-08-17 13:45     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-14  7:56   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-08-14  9:36     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-14 19:29       ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-17 13:17         ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-17 16:10           ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-14 20:31       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-08-18 23:17     ` Linas Vepstas
2025-08-17 16:11   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-13  5:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI/ERR: Fix uevent on failure to recover Lukas Wunner
2025-08-13 23:01   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-14  7:08   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-08-13  5:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI/ERR: Notify drivers " Lukas Wunner
2025-08-13 23:05   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-13  5:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI/ERR: Update device error_state already after reset Lukas Wunner
2025-08-13 23:43   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-13  5:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI/ERR: Remove remnants of .link_reset() callback Lukas Wunner
2025-08-14  0:40   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-13 18:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] PCI: Reduce AER / EEH deviations Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-14  0:30 ` Linas Vepstas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd952c82-9f8b-4396-9170-b34d539a8fac@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sean.c.dardis@intel.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox