Re: [PATCH 1/3] tty: hvcs: Drop unnecessary if block

[Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>]

On 1/14/21 9:57 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> If hvcs_probe() succeeded dev_set_drvdata() is called with a non-NULL
> value, and if hvcs_probe() failed hvcs_remove() isn't called.
> 
> So there is no way dev_get_drvdata() can return NULL in hvcs_remove() and
> the check can just go away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
> index 509d1042825a..3e0461285c34 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
> @@ -825,9 +825,6 @@ static int hvcs_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct tty_struct *tty;
> 
> -	if (!hvcsd)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
>  	/* By this time the vty-server won't be getting any more interrupts */
> 
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
>