From: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:42:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf48e778-130a-df2a-d94b-170bd85d692c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190718032858.28744-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Now that generic code doesn't reference them, move sme_active() and
> sme_me_mask to x86's <asm/mem_encrypt.h>.
>
> Also remove the export for sme_active() since it's only used in files that
> won't be built as modules. sme_me_mask on the other hand is used in
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c (via __sme_set() and __psp_pa()) which can be built as a
> module so its export needs to stay.
You may want to try and build the out-of-tree nvidia driver just to be
sure you can remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL(). But I believe that was related
to the DMA mask check, which now removed, may no longer be a problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 4 +---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 1 -
> include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 14 +-------------
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> index 3eb018508190..ff813a56bc30 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -4,9 +4,7 @@
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> -#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
> -
> -static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> +static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
> extern bool sev_active(void);
>
> int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> index 0c196c47d621..848ce43b9040 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,16 @@ early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size) { return 0;
>
> extern char __start_bss_decrypted[], __end_bss_decrypted[], __start_bss_decrypted_unused[];
>
> +static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
> +{
> + return sme_me_mask;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 sme_get_me_mask(void)
> +{
> + return sme_me_mask;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> #endif /* __X86_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> index c805f0a5c16e..7139f2f43955 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ bool sme_active(void)
> {
> return sme_me_mask && !sev_enabled;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sme_active);
>
> bool sev_active(void)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> index 470bd53a89df..0c5b0ff9eb29 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -18,23 +18,11 @@
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>
> -#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
> -
> -static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> +static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
> static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>
> -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
> -{
> - return sme_me_mask;
> -}
> -
> -static inline u64 sme_get_me_mask(void)
> -{
> - return sme_me_mask;
> -}
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> /*
> * The __sme_set() and __sme_clr() macros are useful for adding or removing
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-18 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-18 3:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86, s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:26 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:29 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86,s390/mm: " Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:42 ` Lendacky, Thomas [this message]
2019-07-18 17:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:47 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 4:59 ` lijiang
2019-07-19 15:47 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 13:01 ` Halil Pasic
2019-07-18 16:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 16:41 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 19:44 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-19 13:12 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 15:45 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf48e778-130a-df2a-d94b-170bd85d692c@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).