linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/3] cpufreq: Migrate away from ->stop_cpu() callback
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:10:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1623825358.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)

Hi Rafael,

Sending these separately from CPPC stuff to avoid unnecessary confusion and
independent merging of these patches. These should get in nevertheless.

commit 367dc4aa932b ("cpufreq: Add stop CPU callback to cpufreq_driver
interface") added the stop_cpu() callback to allow the drivers to do
clean up before the CPU is completely down and its state can't be
modified.

At that time the CPU hotplug framework used to call the cpufreq core's
registered notifier for different events like CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and
CPU_POST_DEAD. The stop_cpu() callback was called during the
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE event.

This is no longer the case, cpuhp_cpufreq_offline() is called only once
by the CPU hotplug core now and we don't really need two separate
callbacks for cpufreq drivers, i.e. stop_cpu() and exit(), as everything
can be done from the exit() callback itself.

Migrate to using the exit() callback instead of stop_cpu().

The stop_cpu() callback isn't removed from core as it will be reused in
a different way in a separate patchset.

--
Viresh

Viresh Kumar (3):
  cpufreq: cppc: Migrate to ->exit() callback instead of ->stop_cpu()
  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Migrate to ->exit() callback instead of
    ->stop_cpu()
  cpufreq: powerenv: Migrate to ->exit() callback instead of
    ->stop_cpu()

 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c    | 46 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c    |  9 +-----
 drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 23 ++++++----------
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514


             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-16  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16  6:40 Viresh Kumar [this message]
2021-06-16  6:40 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] cpufreq: powerenv: Migrate to ->exit() callback instead of ->stop_cpu() Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1623825358.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).