From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF59C4743D for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C156113E for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 01:51:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 96C156113E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FyxD738zNz307S for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:51:03 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.189; helo=szxga03-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com; receiver=) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FyxCj1tC5z2yWJ for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:50:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Fyx774Ylsz69Gm; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:46:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:50:32 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:50:31 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] mm: add setup_initial_init_mm() helper To: Mike Rapoport References: <20210604070633.32363-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20210604070633.32363-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> From: Kefeng Wang Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:50:31 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Andrew Morton , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2021/6/7 5:31, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hello Kefeng, > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 03:06:19PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: >> Add setup_initial_init_mm() helper to setup kernel text, >> data and brk. >> >> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp >> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org >> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: x86@kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang >> --- >> include/linux/mm_types.h | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h >> index 5aacc1c10a45..e1d2429089a4 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h >> @@ -572,6 +572,14 @@ struct mm_struct { >> }; >> >> extern struct mm_struct init_mm; >> +static inline void setup_initial_init_mm(void *start_code, void *end_code, >> + void *end_data, void *brk) > I think it's not that performance sensitive to make it inline. It can be > placed in mm/init-mm.c with a forward declaration in mm.h Ok, I will send a update one with this change. > >> +{ >> + init_mm.start_code = (unsigned long)start_code; >> + init_mm.end_code = (unsigned long)end_code; >> + init_mm.end_data = (unsigned long)end_data; >> + init_mm.brk = (unsigned long)brk; >> +} > >> /* Pointer magic because the dynamic array size confuses some compilers. */ >> static inline void mm_init_cpumask(struct mm_struct *mm) >> -- >> 2.26.2 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-riscv mailing list >> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv