From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA6867A64 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:06:09 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050310082639.GA19275@gate.ebshome.net> References: <20050310082639.GA19275@gate.ebshome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:06:04 -0600 To: "Eugene Surovegin" Cc: Tom Rini , linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: build failure for 2.6.11-mm2 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , right, but if you look back in the pervious -mm builds that past, they also did not have mkImage but still succeeded. It appear some change is now report the lack of mkImage as a build error. If this is desired behavior, should we maybe look at having a copy of its source in the kernel tree? - kumar On Mar 10, 2005, at 2:26 AM, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > Do you have any ideas on what changes occurred in the makefiles to > > cause the uImage related failures: > > > > http://l4x.org/k/?d=2173 > > This looks like mkimage is just not present on build host. I don't > think it's included anywhere in kernel tree, so it must be installed > separately. > > -- > Eugene