From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: ykaliuta@redhat.com, johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, song@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:15:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1e51c6fdf572062cf3009a751c3406bda01b832.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Johan reported the below crash with test_bpf on ppc64 e5500:
test_bpf: #296 ALU_END_FROM_LE 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500
Modules linked in: test_bpf(+)
CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty #1
NIP: 8000000000061c3c LR: 80000000006dea64 CTR: 8000000000061c18
REGS: c0000000032d3420 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty)
MSR: 0000000080089000 <EE,ME> CR: 88002822 XER: 20000000 IRQMASK: 0
<...>
NIP [8000000000061c3c] 0x8000000000061c3c
LR [80000000006dea64] .__run_one+0x104/0x17c [test_bpf]
Call Trace:
.__run_one+0x60/0x17c [test_bpf] (unreliable)
.test_bpf_init+0x6a8/0xdc8 [test_bpf]
.do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x28c
.do_init_module+0x68/0x28c
.load_module+0x2460/0x2abc
.__do_sys_init_module+0x120/0x18c
.system_call_exception+0x110/0x1b8
system_call_common+0xf0/0x210
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x101d0acc
<...>
---[ end trace 47b2bf19090bb3d0 ]---
Illegal instruction
The illegal instruction turned out to be 'ldbrx' emitted for
BPF_FROM_[L|B]E, which was only introduced in ISA v2.06. Guard use of
the same and implement an alternative approach for older processors.
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Reported-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index efad07081cc0e5..9675303b724e93 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -500,6 +500,7 @@
#define PPC_RAW_LDX(r, base, b) (0x7c00002a | ___PPC_RT(r) | ___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
#define PPC_RAW_LHZ(r, base, i) (0xa0000000 | ___PPC_RT(r) | ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_RAW_LHBRX(r, base, b) (0x7c00062c | ___PPC_RT(r) | ___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
+#define PPC_RAW_LWBRX(r, base, b) (0x7c00042c | ___PPC_RT(r) | ___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
#define PPC_RAW_LDBRX(r, base, b) (0x7c000428 | ___PPC_RT(r) | ___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
#define PPC_RAW_STWCX(s, a, b) (0x7c00012d | ___PPC_RS(s) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
#define PPC_RAW_CMPWI(a, i) (0x2c000000 | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 48d2ca3fe126dd..7d38b4be26c3a5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -634,17 +634,21 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
break;
case 64:
- /*
- * Way easier and faster(?) to store the value
- * into stack and then use ldbrx
- *
- * ctx->seen will be reliable in pass2, but
- * the instructions generated will remain the
- * same across all passes
- */
+ /* Store the value to stack and then use byte-reverse loads */
PPC_BPF_STL(dst_reg, 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx));
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx)));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_206)) {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
+ } else {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, 32));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 4));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWBRX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN))
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLDI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], 32));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_2]));
+ }
break;
}
break;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 11:45 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc/bpf: Some fixes and updates Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 01/13] bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack() Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-07 10:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-10 8:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-10 10:36 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 02/13] powerpc32/bpf: Fix codegen for bpf-to-bpf calls Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-10 9:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-10 10:52 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 03/13] powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-08 14:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-10 9:27 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-10 10:56 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/13] tools/bpf: Rename 'struct event' to avoid naming conflict Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-07 10:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 05/13] powerpc/bpf: Skip branch range validation during first pass Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 06/13] powerpc/bpf: Emit a single branch instruction for known short branch ranges Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 07/13] powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXIT Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 09/13] powerpc64/bpf: Do not save/restore LR on each call to bpf_stf_barrier() Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 10/13] powerpc64/bpf: Use r12 for constant blinding Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 11/13] powerpc64/bpf elfv2: Setup kernel TOC in r2 on entry Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-10 9:20 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-11 10:31 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-11 14:35 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-11 14:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-14 11:17 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 12/13] powerpc64/bpf elfv1: Do not load TOC before calling functions Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 13/13] powerpc64/bpf: Optimize instruction sequence used for function calls Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 21:46 ` [PATCH 00/13] powerpc/bpf: Some fixes and updates Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-07 7:36 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-07 10:20 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-10 3:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-01-16 10:41 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1e51c6fdf572062cf3009a751c3406bda01b832.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=ykaliuta@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).