From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com, terry.bowman@amd.com,
tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com, lukas@wunner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 20:29:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d23f7971-2c01-4242-b781-1378d96c130f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127103643.00007991@huawei.com>
On 1/27/26 6:36 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:45:55 +0800
> Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> The AER driver has historically avoided reading the configuration space of
>> an endpoint or RCiEP that reported a fatal error, considering the link to
>> that device unreliable. Consequently, when a fatal error occurs, the AER
>> and DPC drivers do not report specific error types, resulting in logs like:
>>
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: EDR event received
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Reported EDR dev: 0015:00:00.0
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x200d, ERR_FATAL received from 0015:01:00.0
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast error_detected message
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast mmio_enabled message
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast resume message
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: pciehp: Slot(21): Link Down/Up ignored
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: device recovery successful
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: DPC port successfully recovered
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Status for 0015:00:00.0: 0x80
>>
>> AER status registers are sticky and Write-1-to-clear. If the link recovered
>> after hot reset, we can still safely access AER status and TLP header of the
>> error device. In such case, report fatal errors which helps to figure out the
>> error root case.
>>
>> After this patch, the logs like:
>>
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: EDR event received
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Reported EDR dev: 0015:00:00.0
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x200d, ERR_FATAL received from 0015:01:00.0
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast error_detected message
>> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: AER: Errors reported prior to reset
>> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrectable (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID)
>> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: device [144d:a80a] error status/mask=00001000/00400000
>> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: [12] TLP (First)
>> + vfio-pci 0015:01:00.0: AER: TLP Header: 0x4a004010 0x00000040 0x01000000 0xffffffff
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast mmio_enabled message
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: broadcast resume message
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: pciehp: Slot(21): Link Down/Up ignored
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: AER: device recovery successful
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: DPC port successfully recovered
>> pcieport 0015:00:00.0: EDR: Status for 0015:00:00.0: 0x80
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> Hi Shuai,
>
> With the structure zeroed below (just to make this easier to review, not because
> there is a bug as far as I can see)
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> index e0bcaa896803..4c0a2bbe9197 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>
>> @@ -1447,17 +1450,38 @@ int aer_get_device_error_info(struct aer_err_info *info, int i)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +void aer_report_frozen_error(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct aer_err_info info;
>> + int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
>> +
>> + if (type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT && type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
>> + return;
>> +
>
> struct aer_err_info has a bunch of fields. I'd just make sure it's zeroed
> to avoid us having to check that they are all filled in. = {};
> or do it with the initial values being assigned.
>
> info = (struct aer_err_info) {
> .err_dev_num = 0,
> .severity = AER_FATAL,
> .level = KERN_ERR,
> };
> add_error_device(&info, dev);
>
>
Got it. Will fix it in next verison.
Thanks for valuable comments.
Best Regards,
Shuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-24 7:45 [PATCH v7 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:27 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-29 5:49 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-02 14:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-02 21:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07 7:48 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 8:28 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 10:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-27 12:28 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-06 8:41 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:29 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2026-01-28 16:50 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 11:46 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:30 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:58 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-02-03 8:06 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07 8:34 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24 7:45 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] PCI/AER: Only clear error bits in pcie_clear_device_status() Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:45 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03 7:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06 8:12 ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 17:01 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 12:09 ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03 7:53 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06 7:39 ` Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d23f7971-2c01-4242-b781-1378d96c130f@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox