linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tirumala Marri <tmarri@apm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, yur@emcraft.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] PPC4xx: Generelizing drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:39:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2d7c3068b5582bde7529ccc65d71e52@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9BB6EB.7020802@intel.com>

>
> Will both versions of this driver exist in the same kernel build?  For
> example the iop-adma driver supports iop13xx and iop3xx, but we select
> the archtitecture at build time?  Or, as I assume in this case, will
> the
> two (maybe more?) ppc4xx adma drivers all be built in the same image,
> more like ioatdma?


[Marri] We select the architecture at build time.



>
> In the latter case I would recommend a file structure like:
>
> drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c
> drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma_440spe.c
> drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma_460ex.c
>
> With patches to move the chipset specific pieces to their own file.
> Minimizing the code churn in adma.c, or at least showing a progression
> of what is unique and needs to be moved.
>
> This would be similar to how ioatdma is structured and compiles a
> single
> driver to cover the three major hardware revisions.


[Marri]Looks like this driver is similar to iop-adma driver.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-23 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-18  1:42 [PATCH 1/2] PPC4xx: Generelizing drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c tmarri
2010-09-18 21:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-20 18:00   ` Tirumala Marri
2010-09-20 21:31     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-19 20:00 ` Ilya Yanok
2010-09-21 16:51   ` Tirumala Marri
2010-09-23 20:22 ` Dan Williams
2010-09-23 22:39   ` Tirumala Marri [this message]
2010-09-24  6:58     ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-24 18:52       ` Tirumala Marri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d2d7c3068b5582bde7529ccc65d71e52@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tmarri@apm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=yur@emcraft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).