Re: [PATCH net-next v2 05/18] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove redundant check in mv88e6xxx_port_vlan()

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 13:37 +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> > On 12. Apr 2022, at 13:27, Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> > > We know that "dev > dst->last_switch" in the "else" block.
> > > In other words, that "dev - dst->last_switch" is > 0.
> > > 
> > > dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp) can be 0, but the check
> > > "if (bridge_num + dst->last_switch != dev) continue", rewritten as
> > > "if (bridge_num != dev - dst->last_switch) continue", aka
> > > "if (bridge_num != something which cannot be 0) continue",
> > > makes it redundant to have the extra "if (!bridge_num) continue" logic,
> > > since a bridge_num of zero would have been skipped anyway.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> > 
> > Isn't this Vladimir's patch?
> > 
> > If so, it should be commited as Vladimir as the author, and Vladimir's
> > sign-off should appear before yours. When sending out such patches,
> > there should be a From: line for Vladimir as the first line in the body
> > of the patch email.
> 
> yes, you are right. I wasn't sure on how to send those commits, but
> I guess if I just set the commit author correctly it should be fine.
> 
> regarding the order: I thought I did it correctly doing bottom up but
> I confused the order, wasn't on purpose. Sorry about that.
> 
> I'll resend after verifying all the authors and sign-offs are correct.

whoops, too late...

Please, do wait at least 24h before reposting, as pointed out in the
documentation:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc2/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst#L148

Thanks,

Paolo