From: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
To: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: jniethe5@gmail.com, cmr@bluescreens.de, npiggin@gmail.com,
ajd@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] powerpc/code-patching: Verify instruction patch succeeded
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:20:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5febacfc792876848bd4ba58f43b0e24450f250.camel@russell.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021052238.580986-4-bgray@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 16:22 +1100, Benjamin Gray wrote:
> Verifies that if the instruction patching did not return an error
> then
> the value stored at the given address to patch is now equal to the
> instruction we patched it to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> index 34fc7ac34d91..9b9eba574d7e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr,
> ppc_inst_t instr)
> err = __do_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> + WARN_ON(!err && !ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst_read(addr)));
> +
As a side note, I had a look at test-code-patching.c and it doesn't
look like we don't have a test for ppc_inst_equal() with prefixed
instructions. We should fix that.
> return err;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 5:22 [PATCH v8 0/6] Use per-CPU temporary mappings for patching Benjamin Gray
2022-10-21 5:22 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] powerpc: Allow clearing and restoring registers independent of saved breakpoint state Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 3:06 ` Russell Currey
2022-10-21 5:22 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] powerpc/code-patching: Use WARN_ON and fix check in poking_init Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 3:08 ` Russell Currey
2022-10-21 5:22 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] powerpc/code-patching: Verify instruction patch succeeded Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 3:20 ` Russell Currey [this message]
2022-10-25 3:30 ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-21 5:22 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] powerpc/tlb: Add local flush for page given mm_struct and psize Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 3:30 ` Russell Currey
2022-10-24 5:22 ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 4:22 ` Russell Currey
2022-10-21 5:22 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] powerpc/code-patching: Use temporary mm for Radix MMU Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 3:45 ` Russell Currey
2022-10-24 5:17 ` Benjamin Gray
2022-10-24 15:39 ` Christopher M. Riedl
2022-10-24 8:46 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-21 5:22 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] powerpc/code-patching: Use CPU local patch address directly Benjamin Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5febacfc792876848bd4ba58f43b0e24450f250.camel@russell.cc \
--to=ruscur@russell.cc \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cmr@bluescreens.de \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).