From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xS7SD69jbzDr2T for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:54:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v79Arc5L038516 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:54:17 -0400 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2c7x3utbbk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 06:54:17 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:54:14 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org References: <1502202949-8138-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1502202949-8138-3-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170809100835.5kz3zf5sd3oqrrj4@node.shutemov.name> From: Laurent Dufour Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:54:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170809100835.5kz3zf5sd3oqrrj4@node.shutemov.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 09/08/2017 12:08, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:35:35PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: >> @@ -2295,7 +2302,11 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) >> /* >> * Re-check the pte - we dropped the lock >> */ >> - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); >> + if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) { >> + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false); >> + ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY; >> + goto oom_free_new; > > With the change, label is misleading. That's right. But I'm wondering renaming it out to 'out_free_new' and replacing all the matching 'goto' where the label was making sense will help readability ? Have you better idea ?