From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn,
tglx@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org,
gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: fix msi_addr_mask on powerpc and sparc systems
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 09:59:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8440351-7394-4444-9891-b9af1982bd06@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260227164427.GA3897611@bhelgaas>
On 2/27/26 10:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [cc->to powerpc, sparc maintainers for ack]
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 12:32:26PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recent changes [1] which replaced pci_dev::no_64bit_msi with pci_dev::
>> msi_addr_mask inadvertently missed to initialize the pci_dev::msi_addr_mask
>> to the DMA_BIT_MASK(64) on powerpc platform. Due to this, later the
>> validation the programmed MSI address against the msi_addr_mask fails.
>> This causes pci device probe method failures on powerpc platform. We also
>> realized that similar issue could potentially happen on sparc system as
>> well. So this series initializes pci_dev::msi_addr_mask to DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
>> when pci_dev is instantiated for both powerpc and sparc platforms.
>>
>> The first patch in the series fixes this on powerpc platform. The second
>> patch fixes this issue on sparc platform. Please note that as I don't have
>> access to the sparc platform, this patch was only compile tested on the
>> sparc system. Anyone from the community is welcome to test it who has
>> access to the sparc machine.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129-pci-msi-addr-mask-v4-0-70da998f2750@iscas.ac.cn/
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Initialize the pci_dev:msi_addr_mask on sparc platform (Vivian Wang)
>> - Some minor cosmetic fixes (Bjorn Helgaas)
>>
>> Nilay Shroff (2):
>> powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices
>> sparc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices
>>
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 7 +++++++
>> arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> These fix regressions on powerpc and sparc caused by 386ced19e9a3
> ("PCI/MSI: Convert the boolean no_64bit_msi flag to a DMA address
> mask").
>
> These fixes have been tested by Han Gao (SPARC Enterprise T5220),
> Nathaniel Roach (SPARC T5-2), and Venkat Rao Bagalkote (IBM Power
> System LPAR (pseries)).
>
> It'd be great to have acks from the powerpc and sparc folks so they
Sorry for the delayed response, yes we tested this from our end.
Acked-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> could be merged either by Thomas (who merged 386ced19e9a3) or me (via
> PCI tree).
>
> Bjorn
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: fix msi_addr_mask on powerpc and sparc systems Nilay Shroff
2026-02-20 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices Nilay Shroff
2026-02-22 10:46 ` Venkat
2026-03-01 6:59 ` Nam Cao
2026-02-20 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] sparc/pci: " Nilay Shroff
2026-02-21 16:36 ` Han Gao
2026-02-22 6:01 ` Nathaniel Roach
2026-02-21 17:19 ` Han Gao
2026-02-20 10:14 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: fix msi_addr_mask on powerpc and sparc systems Vivian Wang
2026-02-20 13:15 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2026-02-27 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-03 4:29 ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2026-03-03 16:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-02 23:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8440351-7394-4444-9891-b9af1982bd06@linux.ibm.com \
--to=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox