* [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing
@ 2017-04-27 7:43 Pingfan Liu
2017-04-27 18:06 ` Hari Bathini
2017-04-28 10:18 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pingfan Liu @ 2017-04-27 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
Hari Bathini, kernelfans
E.g after fadump reserves mem regions, these regions should not be removed
before fadump explicitly free them.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
index e104c71..201be23 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
@@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base, unsigned int memblock_siz
if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn))
goto out;
+ if (memblock_is_reserved(base))
+ return -EINVAL;
block_sz = pseries_memory_block_size();
sections_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
@@ -388,8 +390,7 @@ static int pseries_remove_mem_node(struct device_node *np)
base = be64_to_cpu(*(unsigned long *)regs);
lmb_size = be32_to_cpu(regs[3]);
- pseries_remove_memblock(base, lmb_size);
- return 0;
+ return pseries_remove_memblock(base, lmb_size);
}
static bool lmb_is_removable(struct of_drconf_cell *lmb)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing
2017-04-27 7:43 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing Pingfan Liu
@ 2017-04-27 18:06 ` Hari Bathini
2017-04-28 4:29 ` Liu ping fan
2017-04-28 10:18 ` kbuild test robot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hari Bathini @ 2017-04-27 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pingfan Liu, linuxppc-dev
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
kernelfans
Hi Pingfan,
On Thursday 27 April 2017 01:13 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> E.g after fadump reserves mem regions, these regions should not be removed
> before fadump explicitly free them.
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index e104c71..201be23 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base, unsigned int memblock_siz
>
> if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn))
> goto out;
> + if (memblock_is_reserved(base))
> + return -EINVAL;
I think memblock reserved regions are not hot removed even without this
patch.
So, can you elaborate on when/why this patch is needed?
Thanks
Hari
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing
2017-04-27 18:06 ` Hari Bathini
@ 2017-04-28 4:29 ` Liu ping fan
2017-05-02 18:37 ` Hari Bathini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liu ping fan @ 2017-04-28 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hari Bathini
Cc: Pingfan Liu, linuxppc-dev, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
Michael Ellerman
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Hari Bathini
<hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Pingfan,
>
>
> On Thursday 27 April 2017 01:13 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>>
>> E.g after fadump reserves mem regions, these regions should not be removed
>> before fadump explicitly free them.
>> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> index e104c71..201be23 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> @@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base,
>> unsigned int memblock_siz
>>
>> if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn))
>> goto out;
>> + if (memblock_is_reserved(base))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
>
> I think memblock reserved regions are not hot removed even without this
> patch.
> So, can you elaborate on when/why this patch is needed?
>
I have not found code to prevent the reserved regions from free. Do I
miss anything?
I will try to reserve a ppc to have a test.
Thx,
Pingfan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing
2017-04-27 7:43 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing Pingfan Liu
2017-04-27 18:06 ` Hari Bathini
@ 2017-04-28 10:18 ` kbuild test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2017-04-28 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pingfan Liu
Cc: kbuild-all, linuxppc-dev, Hari Bathini, Paul Mackerras,
kernelfans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1385 bytes --]
Hi Pingfan,
[auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc8 next-20170428]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pingfan-Liu/powerpc-pseries-hotplug-prevent-the-reserved-mem-from-removing/20170428-092644
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=powerpc
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xd3108): Section mismatch in reference from the function .pseries_remove_memblock() to the function .init.text:.memblock_is_reserved()
The function .pseries_remove_memblock() references
the function __init .memblock_is_reserved().
This is often because .pseries_remove_memblock lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of .memblock_is_reserved is wrong.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 52839 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing
2017-04-28 4:29 ` Liu ping fan
@ 2017-05-02 18:37 ` Hari Bathini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hari Bathini @ 2017-05-02 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu ping fan; +Cc: Paul Mackerras, linuxppc-dev, Pingfan Liu
On Friday 28 April 2017 09:59 AM, Liu ping fan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Hari Bathini
> <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Pingfan,
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 27 April 2017 01:13 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>>> E.g after fadump reserves mem regions, these regions should not be removed
>>> before fadump explicitly free them.
>>> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 5 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>>> index e104c71..201be23 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>>> @@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base,
>>> unsigned int memblock_siz
>>>
>>> if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn))
>>> goto out;
>>> + if (memblock_is_reserved(base))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> I think memblock reserved regions are not hot removed even without this
>> patch.
>> So, can you elaborate on when/why this patch is needed?
>>
> I have not found code to prevent the reserved regions from free. Do I
> miss anything?
IIUC, during hot-remove, while trying to offline reserved pages, it
reports -EBUSY
thus failing to remove a lmb that has reserved memory. I was wondering
if there would
be a case where that doesn't happen and this patch is necessary..
Thanks
Hari
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-02 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-27 7:43 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries hotplug: prevent the reserved mem from removing Pingfan Liu
2017-04-27 18:06 ` Hari Bathini
2017-04-28 4:29 ` Liu ping fan
2017-05-02 18:37 ` Hari Bathini
2017-04-28 10:18 ` kbuild test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).