From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA56DDE0A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:35:54 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <18030.32600.921348.218117@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20070611232824.489103547@arndb.de> <20070611233353.734704855@arndb.de> <18030.15937.699275.958545@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200706121008.01661.arnd@arndb.de> <18030.32600.921348.218117@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] powerpc: Move CONFIG_PPC64 into CPU selection Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:35:29 +0200 To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> * The only major difference between ppc64 and the others is the >> object format of the kernel binary. > > I disagree with that. There are major differences at the > implementation level for a lot of things. It would be good to converge the 32- and 64-bit implementations, and/or allow a single kernel image to work on both 32-bit and 64-bit systems, The current situation is far removed from that, so this patch is a bit premature in that aspect. Segher