From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25454C61DC4 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hW3VG21Vlz2y2L; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:16:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1787840198; cv=none; b=Dwiw5/oiU29ISInEzBsxyJQWYkSbZchmdBnwLa/O3uwDgOhe+ZMoGFsK9HjB2wqRLW+KnFTGbi8ib/X46rUExp8KnpIuDxMmbh8/ahJbxFqfdsFnRd/E9ESr6VI/Pn5vTpMHnSIY9GyWD2d9rP3ixYc7wIB/jXT9y88X1yo5d9oZNY4UD9/jWYPpHmU2bvCnnJp4BmD2IwbQoUezWGZSZLefNG462ccMXt9XQpgo0bzWjCDckUuOEdde5eVGwpT28dnc4ye9N2BsyApSbjE/Xkgs1GvFIRUa8BH/YLnleGefRAYWMII/nsdf4crAd6K+eGRgN5+/Mafa2xkrXaoAOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1787840198; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=dcluX+/mf8lazbWAYbxfRFNoZB8YSwa8nBk94K1KGpg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jRPX0NPBxAi7BzRBlQDXkvY0Nl7bUJt2WJV4K2nvvrfAejuFDkvvtnnzq8BVS8kf3vnBpvnsAYFyeqv79HL/gyooEecj0yxrVkuszGkUdaYC64obDxcpo3FFdxovSjkrGO6GkTvjKfkDs8Qau5rHvPKbPgai2Bc5wqyR9/GTMfm8gIIqo4S8TfKx6PUzFEenFU4mLgrKCJKdkUBM/e3Ha5i8wFZVNrDdOJZ/BZZKfZDZ6o2kM1Zolu/lT0z4NX5werhRpR05jO5FciNsKYCpAEAKqt+qn+tDb+wjW/apOlyO4KDazl5cqHJGHHWehm7Yy93s+PukEDTyHop9I/bN2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=bw2d8TxR; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sbhat@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=bw2d8TxR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sbhat@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hW3VD1PDdz2xGr for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:16:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 67RCVh2j3056633; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:29 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=dcluX+ /mf8lazbWAYbxfRFNoZB8YSwa8nBk94K1KGpg=; b=bw2d8TxRtdi+hGjnlLQfxQ MKhnyHYD+sXET3WLcEpQqRtPUC6z4W/G2RYDYVTFPXYJhm/MbG7GY/ceBPqjlWF5 SjdGRigMb2W+sb1gW2ixAb3hmufgYSwDEygmtRSGLL87dzrhT2DhZS9fArwaxeoI h/hNZ13OBjvAaDiRS8992QFgAHFiQeNzFaa2517I7KprevFCq/KSdYrUaeJWl5nR /V2dTxkzRKSFcdyL/DzDaasY7dehO0ttzjHHFprkRWNzy69U2aDq7v7nDb7AR2a+ 8EzD2w4EaI5Fl27DhoiFRrPAt8SOzmNcu0lp4dnvWjaoTlNIV+6locY42vXdCXCg == Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4g73dxngk3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.7/8.18.1.7) with ESMTP id 67RECE1F019730; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:27 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.230]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4g7ragrakc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 67REGNoF38404478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:23 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4B12004D; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF66F2004B; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.67.92.114] (unknown [9.67.92.114]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:16:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 19:46:18 +0530 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: powerpc: userspace processes crash on abort() from libc.so.6 To: Shrikanth Hegde , linuxppc-dev , tglx@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, riteshh@linux.ibm.com References: Content-Language: en-US From: Shivaprasad G Bhat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Info: AW1haW4tMjYwODI3MDExOCBTYWx0ZWRfX5OrKWeDBh5AK caYK8a9HkZ8MSg7TxO1WDqe+QE+3fgNIeSi1yhceIFJBDN7OxjGfi0QPzua7dlyHaJVGxPXt6r4 mHwUwhjPXztKAbGJsR3X9Y5VqUmg7M8= X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=AYuB2XXG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6a9046bc cx=c_pps a=AfN7/Ok6k8XGzOShvHwTGQ==:117 a=AfN7/Ok6k8XGzOShvHwTGQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=Sv0fKeRqtYgA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=RnoormkPH1_aCDwRdu11:22 a=RzCfie-kr_QcCd8fBx8p:22 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=pnlxZmXi8QIVzasWyfMA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: A4KgM3yLy7F_mvNhXEZ2ZmrpIZ3EIgL6 X-Proofpoint-GUID: A4KgM3yLy7F_mvNhXEZ2ZmrpIZ3EIgL6 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwODI3MDExOCBTYWx0ZWRfXwsr9uiKhzBsw Yd3txQv3UExoUhd0S9PryQ8fVxy4OIk3uDHQjna+2JmOWZw34LmmJ92DtVjwgo9xpMLFyg1JLV+ GGsihZ84G+pBCCMgHa3/wLW8xrYhmjgc6qF6kxfbP/5R9Vy+o09yCJ4QSuL613YJUI+huAJI4qH wDk3bPKCejT+A6LsRv8K679XFmNPCkcvFXBhDH8p97to1PboZH+UDp3CextRj+gFha8jSTtLQMl PXuZOZZtgNskozJkHG1LF3enDhni75f3hx/ebGXR8eiH7nqpQR+eD51X6K90aVh+yUEX6SJcbcz mFNYx3hAyRvj1nRxUub9+QmbxjcdvwyD8/4v9UUkkNnyg1hbGJMVj9a04BCZTMjz791rzz5YRrE VKYrEvtR3cEPB2zr85MtIZIB30bILj6gIKKoASRjUU/ed8yfmBnojZ36x8DemytkBzW3voGjpZf Fq1T0zs/eW6MqAGWEbA== X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1176,Hydra:6.1.134,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-08-27_05,2026-08-26_02,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2606150000 definitions=main-2608270118 Hi Shrikanth, On 8/27/26 5:08 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote: > Hi Shivaprasad. > > On 8/27/26 11:13 AM, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote: >> >> Hi All, Thomas, >> >> On my PPC64 machine, I see the below systemd crash orginating from >> abort() during boot on top of the tree. Complete dmesg can be seen >> here [1] >>        abort (libc.so.6 + 0x29484) >>        __libc_message_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x9e00c) >>        __libc_fatal (libc.so.6 + 0x9e06c) >>        start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xadffc) >>        __clone (libc.so.6 + 0x152d68) >>        __clone (libc.so.6 + 0x152d68) >>        create_thread.constprop.0 (libc.so.6 + 0xad9c8) >> >> The git bisect pointed me to commit 3424d8c18a7da "(Merge tag 'core- >> entry-2026-08-17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ >> tip/tip)" >> >> Please find the kernel config used to build the kernel at [2]. >> >> I have tried applying the pending fixes from Mukesh [3] and Ritesh [4] >> for the currently outstanding issues and still see the problem. >> >> The system is running Fedora 42, with glibc-2.41-7.fc42.ppc64le. The >> complete list of toolchain and packages can be found here [5] >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Shivaprasad >> >> References: >> 1 - https://gist.github.com/ >> shivaprasadbhat/6f166374bab12b4f4c1cd4ac829e562c >> 2 - https://gist.github.com/shivaprasadbhat/ >> aa499468e124015eec5932fb13e88e05 >> 3 - https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/ >> lda1jyut.ritesh.list@gmail.com/#t >> 4 - https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260820134718.2176411-1- >> mkchauras@gmail.com/ >> 5 - https://gist.github.com/shivaprasadbhat/ >> ae56ca849c3009e8642a6313dc465ea7 >> >> ========= >> Backtrace from dmesg: >> [   22.039343][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: Module libsystemd- >> shared-257.6-1.fc42.so from rpm systemd-257.6-1.fc42.ppc64le >> [   22.039378][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: Stack trace of thread >> 1828: >> [   22.039378][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: Stack trace of thread >> 1828: >> [   22.039401][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #0  0x00007fffa4c29484 >> abort (libc.so.6 + 0x29484) >> [   22.039401][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #0  0x00007fffa4c29484 >> abort (libc.so.6 + 0x29484) >> [   22.039429][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #1  0x00007fffa4c9e00c >> __libc_message_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x9e00c) >> [   22.039429][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #1  0x00007fffa4c9e00c >> __libc_message_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x9e00c) >> [   22.039461][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #2  0x00007fffa4c9e06c >> __libc_fatal (libc.so.6 + 0x9e06c) >> [   22.039461][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #2  0x00007fffa4c9e06c >> __libc_fatal (libc.so.6 + 0x9e06c) >> [   22.039491][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #3  0x00007fffa4cadffc >> start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xadffc) >> [   22.039491][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #3  0x00007fffa4cadffc >> start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xadffc) >> [   22.039521][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #4  0x00007fffa4d52d68 >> __clone (libc.so.6 + 0x152d68) >> [   22.039521][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #4  0x00007fffa4d52d68 >> __clone (libc.so.6 + 0x152d68) >> [   22.039551][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #5  0x00007fffa4d52d68 >> __clone (libc.so.6 + 0x152d68) >> [   22.039551][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #5  0x00007fffa4d52d68 >> __clone (libc.so.6 + 0x152d68) >> [   22.039580][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #6  0x00007fffa4cad9c8 >> create_thread.constprop.0 (libc.so.6 + 0xad9c8) >> [   22.039580][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #6  0x00007fffa4cad9c8 >> create_thread.constprop.0 (libc.so.6 + 0xad9c8) >> [   22.039614][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #7  0x00000000003af858 >> n/a (n/a + 0x0) >> [   22.039614][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: #7  0x00000000003af858 >> n/a (n/a + 0x0) >> [   22.039639][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: ELF object binary >> architecture: PowerPC64 >> [   22.039639][ T1833] systemd-coredump[1833]: ELF object binary >> architecture: PowerPC64 >> [   22.042109][    T1] systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: Scheduled >> restart job, restart counter is at 1. > > I was looking at merge patch and It is possible that TIF_SYSCALL_RET is > still set when it is returned > and maybe causing a mismatch. > > Does below help? > --- > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c > @@ -19,8 +19,10 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(struct pt_regs > *regs, unsigned long r0) >      long ret; >      syscall_fn f; > > -    if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, > &r0))) > +    if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, > &r0))) { > +        clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET); Yes. This worked. Thanks, Shivaprasad>          return syscall_get_error(current, regs); > +    } > >      if (unlikely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_RET))) >          return syscall_get_error(current, regs);