From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17509C43441 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F2A8223D8 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:50:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8F2A8223D8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42tpwC23WKzF3Xc for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:50:03 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=anshuman.khandual@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42tpsC4jJgzDqf6 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:47:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9271E80D; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.163.1.201] (unknown [10.163.1.201]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0D023F5A0; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:47:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: Replace all open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE To: Hans Verkuil , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1541990515-11670-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:17:19 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 11/12/2018 02:13 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 11/12/2018 03:41 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> At present there are multiple places where invalid node number is encoded >> as -1. Even though implicitly understood it is always better to have macros >> in there. Replace these open encodings for an invalid node number with the >> global macro NUMA_NO_NODE. This helps remove NUMA related assumptions like >> 'invalid node' from various places redirecting them to a common definition. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual >> --- >> Build tested this with multiple cross compiler options like alpha, sparc, >> arm64, x86, powerpc64le etc with their default config which might not have >> compiled tested all driver related changes. I will appreciate folks giving >> this a test in their respective build environment. >> >> All these places for replacement were found by running the following grep >> patterns on the entire kernel code. Please let me know if this might have >> missed some instances. This might also have replaced some false positives. >> I will appreciate suggestions, inputs and review. > The 'node' in the drivers/media and the drivers/video sources has nothing to > do with numa. It's an index for a framebuffer instead (i.e. the X in /dev/fbX). Thanks for the input. Will drop the changes there.