From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.176]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81AFA679F0 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:15:51 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200603100822.42764.david.jander@protonic.nl> References: <1CFEB358338412458B21FAA0D78FE86D02CABEE3@rennsmail02.eu.thmulti.com> <200603100822.42764.david.jander@protonic.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: Stable Linux kernel 2.6 for MPC8XX Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:16:10 -0500 To: David Jander Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:22 AM, David Jander wrote: > I believe most of those observations and measurements are not valid > anymore. > Kernel 2.6 for 8xx has come a long way since this article was written. They are still valid, we just have more knowledge about how to configure the kernels and have added some features you can use to mitigate the performance issues. The Linux 2.6 kernel is simply bigger than 2.4, and on these small, resource challenged processors, you need to very carefully configure the kernels to your requirements. Thanks. -- Dan