From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BD9C4332D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61CDC2072D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:12:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 61CDC2072D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48kBjf0gQRzDrcQ for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:12:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=buserror.net (client-ip=165.227.176.147; helo=baldur.buserror.net; envelope-from=oss@buserror.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Received: from baldur.buserror.net (baldur.buserror.net [165.227.176.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48kBh01c2BzDrP7 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:11:12 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [2601:449:8480:af0:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0] by baldur.buserror.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jF9tu-0000dq-Qb; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:08:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: Scott Wood To: Jason Yan , mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, diana.craciun@nxp.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:08:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200306064033.3398-7-yanaijie@huawei.com> References: <20200306064033.3398-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> <20200306064033.3398-7-yanaijie@huawei.com> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2601:449:8480:af0:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yanaijie@huawei.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, diana.craciun@nxp.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com, dja@axtens.net X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: rename kaslr-booke32.rst to kaslr-booke.rst and add 64bit part X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:08:31 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on baldur.buserror.net) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dja@axtens.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 14:40 +0800, Jason Yan wrote: > @@ -38,5 +41,29 @@ bit of the entropy to decide the index of the 64M zone. > Then we chose a > > kernstart_virt_addr > > + > +KASLR for Freescale BookE64 > +--------------------------- > + > +The implementation for Freescale BookE64 is similar as BookE32. One similar to > +difference is that Freescale BookE64 set up a TLB mapping of 1G during > +booting. Another difference is that ppc64 needs the kernel to be > +64K-aligned. So we can randomize the kernel in this 1G mapping and make > +it 64K-aligned. This can save some code to creat another TLB map at early create -Scott