linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Merging ppc32 and ppc64
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:30:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc3d7701e701266ffe852acf4da127ed@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508091510400.28068@numbat.sonytel.be>

>>>> I don't see the merge as changing the actual code that gets executed
>>>> on any given platform very much, except in one respect: we are going
>>>> to standardize on a flattened device tree as the way that 
>>>> information
>>>> about the platform gets passed from the boot loader to the kernel.
>                          
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^***********^^^^^^^^******^

Yes, and that is exactly what I do not want.  We are not going
to require OF implementations that do not need yaboot or similar
to pass a flattened device tree to the kernel, eh?  Also, there
is no reason why something like yaboot (with an OF still running
underneath) should have to care about anything device-tree related
at all; the OS can just as easily ask the OF itself.


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-09 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-03  3:07 Merging ppc32 and ppc64 Paul Mackerras
2005-08-03  5:48 ` Fwd: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-08 17:59 ` Joel Schopp
2005-08-08 23:48   ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-09 13:09   ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 13:11     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-08-09 13:30       ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2005-08-09 14:12         ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 14:47           ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-08-09 15:01             ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 16:21               ` Tom Rini
2005-08-09 17:41                 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 17:47                   ` Tom Rini
2005-08-09 18:49                     ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 15:16           ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 22:55         ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-09 23:00           ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-10 10:15           ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 14:52     ` Olof Johansson
2005-08-09 22:48     ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-10 10:51       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-04  2:37 Goodman, Brad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc3d7701e701266ffe852acf4da127ed@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).