From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 ] powerpc/numa: Invalidate numa_cpu_lookup_table on cpu remove
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:19:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd9519fb-c911-61de-ec30-89a257ba8b4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151699561194.20320.12952014708209986173.stgit@ltcalpine2-lp14.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
On 01/26/2018 11:41 AM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> When DLPAR removing a CPU, the unmapping of the cpu from a node in
> unmap_cpu_from_node() should also invalidate the CPUs entry in the
> numa_cpu_lookup_table. There is not a guarantee that on a subsequent
> DLPAR add of the CPU the associativity will be the same and thus
> could be in a different node. Invalidating the entry in the
> numa_cpu_lookup_table causes the associativity to be read from the
> device tree at the time of the add.
>
> The current behavior of not invalidating the CPUs entry in the
> numa_cpu_lookup_table can result in scenarios where the the topology
> layout of CPUs in the partition does not match the device tree
> or the topology reported by the HMC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Originally sent Dec. 5 2017, no reply, resending.
>
> Updates for V2: Move the invalidation from unmap_cpu_from_node to
> pseries_remove_processor, the former routine is also called during cpu
> offline and we do not want to invalidate during cpu offline.
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 5 +++++
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 5 -----
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> index 88187c285c70..1c02e6900f78 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ extern int sysfs_add_device_to_node(struct device *dev, int nid);
> extern void sysfs_remove_device_from_node(struct device *dev, int nid);
> extern int numa_update_cpu_topology(bool cpus_locked);
>
> +static inline void update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(unsigned int cpu, int node)
> +{
> + numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu] = node;
> +}
> +
> static inline int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
> {
> int nid;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index 268c7a2d9a5b..7ec3a0d787d3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -143,11 +143,6 @@ static void reset_numa_cpu_lookup_table(void)
> numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu] = -1;
> }
>
> -static void update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(unsigned int cpu, int node)
> -{
> - numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu] = node;
> -}
> -
> static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node)
> {
> update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(cpu, node);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> index a7d14aa7bb7c..09083ad82f7a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <asm/xics.h>
> #include <asm/xive.h>
> #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
>
> #include "pseries.h"
> #include "offline_states.h"
> @@ -331,6 +332,7 @@ static void pseries_remove_processor(struct device_node *np)
> BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
> set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
> set_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu, -1);
> + update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(cpu, -1);
> break;
> }
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-27 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-26 19:41 [PATCH RESEND V2 ] powerpc/numa: Invalidate numa_cpu_lookup_table on cpu remove Nathan Fontenot
2018-01-27 0:19 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2018-01-27 8:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-01-29 19:27 ` Nathan Fontenot
2018-02-09 4:00 ` [RESEND, V2] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd9519fb-c911-61de-ec30-89a257ba8b4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox