Hi,

I have a question for submitting my changes:
As I said I have commented a few line in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
#$(obj)/4xx.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/ebony.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/cuboot-taishan.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/cuboot-katmai.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/treeboot-walnut.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=40

I guess that shouldn't be integrated in my patch, should I ?
For what I have found on websearch that should come from my gcc version (3.4.3 with specific stuff).
But still I needed that...

thanks,
Maxime

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:56 AM, maxime louvel <m.louvel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I wanted first to check how the kernel is behaving, with a few tests.
Then what is the best solution to do this ?
A patch from the 2.6.25-rc3 vanilla kernel ?

cheers,
Maxime


On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, maxime louvel wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> I am answering my self sorry for the spam...
> Just to say that my problem has been solve if someone has something
> similar...
> My changes were good, I just didn't compile the good file...

Any plans to submit patches to add support for this board to the kernel?

- k




--
Maxime Louvel
0044 7964 5555 80
43 Allen road
Whitemore reans
WV60AW Wolverhampton
United Kingdom



--
Maxime Louvel
0044 7964 5555 80
43 Allen road
Whitemore reans
WV60AW Wolverhampton
United Kingdom