From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2132EDDE02 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:31:07 +1100 (EST) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so3222878wxd.15 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:31:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:31:06 +0000 From: "maxime louvel" To: "Kumar Gala" Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc3 on mpc8548amc doesn't boot In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_8780_8683398.1204187466181" References: Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ------=_Part_8780_8683398.1204187466181 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I have a question for submitting my changes: As I said I have commented a few line in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile #$(obj)/4xx.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/ebony.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/cuboot-taishan.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/cuboot-katmai.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/treeboot-walnut.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=40 I guess that shouldn't be integrated in my patch, should I ? For what I have found on websearch that should come from my gcc version ( 3.4.3 with specific stuff). But still I needed that... thanks, Maxime On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:56 AM, maxime louvel wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted first to check how the kernel is behaving, with a few tests. > Then what is the best solution to do this ? > A patch from the 2.6.25-rc3 vanilla kernel ? > > cheers, > Maxime > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Kumar Gala > wrote: > > > > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, maxime louvel wrote: > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > I am answering my self sorry for the spam... > > > Just to say that my problem has been solve if someone has something > > > similar... > > > My changes were good, I just didn't compile the good file... > > > > Any plans to submit patches to add support for this board to the kernel? > > > > - k > > > > > > > -- > Maxime Louvel > 0044 7964 5555 80 > 43 Allen road > Whitemore reans > WV60AW Wolverhampton > United Kingdom > -- Maxime Louvel 0044 7964 5555 80 43 Allen road Whitemore reans WV60AW Wolverhampton United Kingdom ------=_Part_8780_8683398.1204187466181 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

I have a question for submitting my changes:
As I said I have commented a few line in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
#$(obj)/4xx.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/ebony.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/cuboot-taishan.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/cuboot-katmai.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405
#$(obj)/treeboot-walnut.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=40

I guess that shouldn't be integrated in my patch, should I ?
For what I have found on websearch that should come from my gcc version (3.4.3 with specific stuff).
But still I needed that...

thanks,
Maxime

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:56 AM, maxime louvel <m.louvel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I wanted first to check how the kernel is behaving, with a few tests.
Then what is the best solution to do this ?
A patch from the 2.6.25-rc3 vanilla kernel ?

cheers,
Maxime


On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, maxime louvel wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> I am answering my self sorry for the spam...
> Just to say that my problem has been solve if someone has something
> similar...
> My changes were good, I just didn't compile the good file...

Any plans to submit patches to add support for this board to the kernel?

- k




--
Maxime Louvel
0044 7964 5555 80
43 Allen road
Whitemore reans
WV60AW Wolverhampton
United Kingdom



--
Maxime Louvel
0044 7964 5555 80
43 Allen road
Whitemore reans
WV60AW Wolverhampton
United Kingdom ------=_Part_8780_8683398.1204187466181--