From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xy6nf6myDzDqXy for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:54:30 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning To: Joe Perches , Sergey Senozhatsky , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , James Bottomley Cc: Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Jessica Yu , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft References: <20170920162910.32053-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170920162910.32053-8-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com> From: Helge Deller Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:53:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 20.09.2017 19:38, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart >> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such >> dereference is required. >> >> checkpatch warning example: >> >> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF' > > If this series is accepted, I think this message > is unclear and would prefer something like: Is it worth to mention, that it's still needed in older kernels? Just in case some patch get's backported. Helge