From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BCCC4338F for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63CB960F70 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 63CB960F70 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GfMSh0dyjz3cn5 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 03:34:44 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Z4EhkCkF; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Z4EhkCkF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GfMS90hrxz2xKK for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 03:34:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 173HY6kp182576; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:34:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=xCMK8/8VXneVIihnqtZrubWggVdCb0/Uyk8DBlIiQB0=; b=Z4EhkCkFYE11ODtIBa8o2F/bFgxRDZcIwpAwdg5qXagt9PLjt617zl/rUphgWRyK+uaT ODCxer0962vJAKx6LnyjYASUL9sZ80xb/PYh+RHiHRcuNr9dIr3swWf6piAq9amCmGJW yRdn64jB8dfvzn8tjb3TKh4vWYk8tQk9fWilPRQ0fugaPrK/VaRaK7clznYc+mciIxoL 2dihYelwTvO/tzl0MsnUKhTM4nG3CdvY4tYyNJb6CswOAOAodKaWFbWuXKJvuFT+q9RQ i40NdfFmORwNU35X2mUjjFxqY+h2xDnn6CMeHir0r5O/rtYr7JqZyASXtAKy8b7x3Z+W 2g== Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3a76r5f34t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 03 Aug 2021 13:34:11 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 173HWNST013340; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:08 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3a4x58psjk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:34:08 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 173HY51S50987408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:05 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284B6A405C; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD344A4066; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pomme.local (unknown [9.145.42.112]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:34:04 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM To: Nathan Lynch , mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org References: <20210517090606.56930-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <87sfzqigd9.fsf@linux.ibm.com> From: Laurent Dufour Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:34:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87sfzqigd9.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ytNAPOyUUjceBx_GHWx4lC51zqu37OcO X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ytNAPOyUUjceBx_GHWx4lC51zqu37OcO X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-08-03_05:2021-08-03, 2021-08-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2108030114 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tyrel Datwyler Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Le 03/08/2021 à 19:32, Nathan Lynch a écrit : > Laurent Dufour writes: >> V5: >> - Reword the commit's description to address Nathan's comments. > > Thanks. Still don't like the global variable usage but: > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch > Thanks Nathan, I don't like either the global variable usage but I can't see any smarter way to achieve that. Laurent.