From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29555C433E0 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F33B64DC4 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:19:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2F33B64DC4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dxrbk4BmSz3dLw for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:18:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=robin.murphy@arm.com; receiver=) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DxrbM6rL0z30M3 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:18:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B392E1FB; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:18:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.52.136] (unknown [10.57.52.136]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A040A3F7D7; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:18:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] iommu: remove DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20210301084257.945454-1-hch@lst.de> <20210301084257.945454-15-hch@lst.de> <1658805c-ed28-b650-7385-a56fab3383e3@arm.com> <20210310091501.GC5928@lst.de> <20210310092533.GA6819@lst.de> <20210311082609.GA6990@lst.de> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:18:24 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210311082609.GA6990@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Joerg Roedel , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Li Yang , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, David Woodhouse , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2021-03-11 08:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:39:57PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> Actually... Just mirroring the iommu_dma_strict value into >>> struct iommu_domain should solve all of that with very little >>> boilerplate code. >> >> Yes, my initial thought was to directly replace the attribute with a >> common flag at iommu_domain level, but since in all cases the behaviour >> is effectively global rather than actually per-domain, it seemed >> reasonable to take it a step further. This passes compile-testing for >> arm64 and x86, what do you think? > > It seems to miss a few bits, and also generally seems to be not actually > apply to recent mainline or something like it due to different empty > lines in a few places. Yeah, that was sketched out on top of some other development patches, and in being so focused on not breaking any of the x86 behaviours I did indeed overlook fully converting the SMMU drivers... oops! (my thought was to do the conversion for its own sake, then clean up the redundant attribute separately, but I guess it's fine either way) > Let me know what you think of the version here: > > http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/iommu-cleanup > > I'll happily switch the patch to you as the author if you're fine with > that as well. I still have reservations about removing the attribute API entirely and pretending that io_pgtable_cfg is anything other than a SoC-specific private interface, but the reworked patch on its own looks reasonable to me, thanks! (I wasn't too convinced about the iommu_cmd_line wrappers either...) Just iommu_get_dma_strict() needs an export since the SMMU drivers can be modular - I consciously didn't add that myself since I was mistakenly thinking only iommu-dma would call it. Robin.