From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090EE679EA for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:00:27 +1100 (EST) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FMAR9-0000LK-IO for linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:00:11 +0100 Received: from mail.toimi.com ([208.45.127.50]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:00:11 +0100 Received: from dave by mail.toimi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:00:11 +0100 To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org From: David Updegraff Subject: swizzling pci irqs Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:59:50 -0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: news List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi. If there were a noswizzle option to the kernel command line that resulted in pci scan simply trusting that the bootrom/u-boot had already correctly assigned the PCI irqs.... every tom,dick,harry, and yours-truly wouldn't have to make a new platform to define the swizzle-o-the-day. Or have I already missed this argument? -dbu