From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B91679E2 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 04:52:56 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <429DFA28.30509@mvista.com> References: <429DFA28.30509@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:52:29 -0500 To: "Mark A. Greer" , Dan Malek , Matt Porter , Tom Rini Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: bd_t Cleaning: Board Changes List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Well, as 85xx/83xx maintainer I'm ok with it. We should probably need 4xx (Matt) and 8xx/82xx (Dan/Tom) agreement. - kumar On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Mark A. Greer wrote: > Jon Loeliger wrote: > >> >> >> Part Two of Four, the Board Changes. >> >> ppc/platforms/4xx/ash.h | 21 - >> ppc/platforms/4xx/bubinga.c | 4 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/bubinga.h | 23 - >> ppc/platforms/4xx/cpci405.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/ebony.c | 9 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/ep405.c | 12 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/ep405.h | 13 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/luan.c | 7 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/oak.c | 15 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/oak.h | 19 - >> ppc/platforms/4xx/oak_setup.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/ocotea.c | 13 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood5.h | 13 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood6.c | 27 - >> ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood6.h | 13 >> ppc/platforms/4xx/sycamore.h | 22 - >> ppc/platforms/4xx/walnut.h | 22 - >> ppc/platforms/4xx/xilinx_ml300.h | 12 >> ppc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_sys.c | 49 +- >> ppc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_sys.h | 1 >> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc8540_ads.c | 57 ++- >> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc8560_ads.c | 21 - >> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads_common.c | 10 >> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads_common.h | 1 >> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds_common.c | 48 +- >> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds_common.h | 1 >> ppc/platforms/85xx/sbc8560.c | 19 - >> ppc/platforms/85xx/sbc85xx.c | 14 >> ppc/platforms/85xx/sbc85xx.h | 1 >> ppc/platforms/85xx/stx_gp3.c | 34 - >> ppc/platforms/85xx/stx_gp3.h | 1 >> ppc/platforms/bseip.h | 13 >> ppc/platforms/ccm.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/cpci690.h | 10 >> ppc/platforms/est8260.h | 18 >> ppc/platforms/fads.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/hdpu.c | 13 >> ppc/platforms/hermes.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/ip860.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/ivms8.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/katana.c | 6 >> ppc/platforms/lantec.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/lite5200.c | 9 >> ppc/platforms/lwmon.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/mbx.h | 22 - >> ppc/platforms/pcu_e.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/pq2ads.c | 1 >> ppc/platforms/pq2ads.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.c | 32 - >> ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/rpx8260.h | 19 - >> ppc/platforms/rpxclassic.h | 13 >> ppc/platforms/rpxlite.h | 13 >> ppc/platforms/sandpoint.c | 11 >> ppc/platforms/sandpoint.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.c | 6 >> ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/sbs8260.h | 18 >> ppc/platforms/spd8xx.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/tqm8260.h | 2 >> ppc/platforms/tqm8260_setup.c | 1 >> ppc/platforms/tqm8xx.h | 2 >> >> >> > > > All, > > So is this patch going to go in? I haven't seen anyone "push it up". > The reason I'm asking is that I have a couple patches that I would like > to push up but they will collide with this one so I need to know if it > (or a variation thereof) is going to go in or not. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded