From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/23] powerpc/membarrier: Remove special barrier on mm switch
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 08:43:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1664cf686034204b8dd5dc1d2bf18e4058b00fd.1641659630.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1641659630.git.luto@kernel.org>
powerpc did the following on some, but not all, paths through
switch_mm_irqs_off():
/*
* Only need the full barrier when switching between processes.
* Barrier when switching from kernel to userspace is not
* required here, given that it is implied by mmdrop(). Barrier
* when switching from userspace to kernel is not needed after
* store to rq->curr.
*/
if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
(MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
return;
This is puzzling: if !prev, then one might expect that we are switching
from kernel to user, not user to kernel, which is inconsistent with the
comment. But this is all nonsense, because the one and only caller would
never have prev == NULL and would, in fact, OOPS if prev == NULL.
In any event, this code is unnecessary, since the new generic
membarrier_finish_switch_mm() provides the same barrier without arch help.
arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h remains as an empty header,
because a later patch in this series will add code to it.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h | 24 ------------------------
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
index de7f79157918..b90766e95bd1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
@@ -1,28 +1,4 @@
#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H
#define _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H
-static inline void membarrier_arch_switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
- struct mm_struct *next,
- struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- /*
- * Only need the full barrier when switching between processes.
- * Barrier when switching from kernel to userspace is not
- * required here, given that it is implied by mmdrop(). Barrier
- * when switching from userspace to kernel is not needed after
- * store to rq->curr.
- */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) &&
- likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
- (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
- MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
- return;
-
- /*
- * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
- * after storing to rq->curr, before going back to user-space.
- */
- smp_mb();
-}
-
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
index 74246536b832..5f2daa6b0497 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
asm volatile ("dssall");
if (!new_on_cpu)
- membarrier_arch_switch_mm(prev, next, tsk);
/*
* The actual HW switching method differs between the various
--
2.33.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-08 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1641659630.git.luto@kernel.org>
2022-01-08 16:43 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2022-01-10 8:42 ` [PATCH 06/23] powerpc/membarrier: Remove special barrier on mm switch Christophe Leroy
2022-01-12 15:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 07/23] membarrier: Rewrite sync_core_before_usermode() and improve documentation Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 16:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1664cf686034204b8dd5dc1d2bf18e4058b00fd.1641659630.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).