LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, "Paul Walmsley" <pjw@kernel.org>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Jinjie Ruan" <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	"Magnus Lindholm" <linmag7@gmail.com>,
	"Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)" <mkchauras@gmail.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] entry, treewide: Make syscall_enter_from_user_mode[_work]() indicate syscall execution
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:57:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e35a11d2bd1a8dfa6c1b8d67fe2940c3fd507596.camel@rendec.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260712141346.772209074@kernel.org>

On Sun, 2026-07-12 at 23:25 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The return values of syscall_enter_from_user_mode[_work]() are
> non-intuitive. Both functions return the syscall number which should be
> invoked by the architecture specific syscall entry code. The returned
> number can be:
> 
>   - the unmodified syscall number which was handed in by the caller
> 
>   - a modified syscall number (ptrace, seccomp, trace/probe/bpf)
> 
> That has an additional twist. If the return value is -1L then the caller is
> not allowed to modify the return value as that indicates that the modifying
> entity requests to abort the syscall and set the return value already. That
> can obviously not be differentiated from a syscall which handed in -1 as
> syscall number.
> 
> The most trivial way to deal with that is:
> 
>     set_return_value(regs, -ENOSYS);
>     nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, nr);
>     if (valid(nr))
>     	handle_syscall(regs, nr);
> 
> That's what LOONGARCH, RISCV, and X86 do. But PowerPC and S390 do not
> preset the return value, so when user space hands in -1 and there is
> nothing setting the return value in the entry work code, then the syscall
> is skipped but the return value is whatever random data has been in the
> return value register.
> 
> Change the return values of syscall_enter_from_user_mode[_work]() to
> boolean and return false, when either ptrace or seccomp request to skip the
> syscall. If they return true, update the syscall number as it might have
> been changed.
> 
> That results in slightly different behaviour of the architectures versus
> tracing.
> 
> If the syscall tracepoint has probe/BPF attached, those might set the
> syscall number to -1 and also set the return value. PowerPC and S390 will
> then overwrite that value with -ENOSYS. The other architectures will just
> ignore it like any other invalid syscall and use the modified one.
> 
> Originally-by: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> ---
> V2: Change the return logic so Power and S390 can insist on being special.
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/entry.rst |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/syscall.c  |   14 ++++++------
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c    |    3 +-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c        |   11 ++++-----
>  arch/s390/kernel/syscall.c       |    7 ++++--
>  arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c      |   25 ++++++++++-----------
>  arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c      |   12 +++++-----
>  include/linux/entry-common.h     |   32 +++++++++++++--------------
>  8 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

I've been staring at this for a while. My only concern is that for
powerpc and s390, which do not set a default return value, the return
value is no longer forced to -ENOSYS for the cases when
syscall_trace_enter() returns False. Previously, it was turned into a -
1 in syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work() and interpreted as a syscall
number, so the architecture specific code took the invalid syscall
number path where it set the return value to -ENOSYS explicitly.

That implies that in all 3 cases when syscall_trace_enter() returns
False, the underlying function that denied the syscall *must* also set
the syscall return value (or deliver a signal or rollback the syscall),
or else the return value would be junk. That *seems* to be the case as
far as I can tell, but the ramifications are quite deep, and I must
admit I don't fully understand everything.

With that said,

Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>

> --- a/Documentation/core-api/entry.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/entry.rst
> @@ -58,26 +58,51 @@ state transitions must run with interrup
>  Syscalls
>  --------
>  
> -Syscall-entry code starts in assembly code and calls out into low-level C code
> -after establishing low-level architecture-specific state and stack frames. This
> -low-level C code must not be instrumented. A typical syscall handling function
> -invoked from low-level assembly code looks like this:
> +Syscall-entry code starts in assembly code and calls out into low-level C
> +code after establishing low-level architecture-specific state and stack
> +frames. This low-level C code must not be instrumented. The recommended
> +syscall handling function invoked from low-level assembly code looks like
> +this:
>  
>  .. code-block:: c
>  
> -  noinstr void syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
> +  noinstr void syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, long nr)
>    {
>  	arch_syscall_enter(regs);
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, nr);
> +	result_reg(regs) = -ENOSYS;
> +	if (syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &nr)) {
> +		instrumentation_begin();
> +		if (valid(nr)
> +			result_reg(regs) = invoke_syscall(regs, nr);
> +		instrumentation_end();
> +	}
> +	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> +  }
>  
> -	instrumentation_begin();
> -	if (!invoke_syscall(regs, nr) && nr != -1)
> -	 	result_reg(regs) = __sys_ni_syscall(regs);
> -	instrumentation_end();
> +This is the most resilent variant as it has always a guaranteed valid
> +return code. The alternative variant is:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
>  
> +  noinstr void syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, long nr)
> +  {
> +	arch_syscall_enter(regs);
> +	if (syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &nr)) {
> +		instrumentation_begin();
> +		if (valid(nr)
> +			result_reg(regs) = invoke_syscall(regs, nr);
> +		else
> +			result_reg(regs) = -ENOSYS;
> +		instrumentation_end();
> +	}
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
>    }
>  
> +That works for most situations except when a probe/BPF attached to the
> +syscall tracepoint sets an invalid syscall number e.g. -1 and also modifies
> +the result register. So this variant will obviously overwrite the modified
> +result with -ENOSYS.
> +
>  syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() first invokes
>  enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() which establishes state in the
>  following order:
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ typedef long (*sys_call_fn)(unsigned lon
>  
>  void noinstr __no_stack_protector do_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	unsigned long nr;
>  	sys_call_fn syscall_fn;
> +	unsigned long nr;
>  
>  	nr = regs->regs[11];
>  	/* Set for syscall restarting */
> @@ -69,12 +69,12 @@ void noinstr __no_stack_protector do_sys
>  	regs->orig_a0 = regs->regs[4];
>  	regs->regs[4] = -ENOSYS;
>  
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, nr);
> -
> -	if (nr < NR_syscalls) {
> -		syscall_fn = sys_call_table[array_index_nospec(nr, NR_syscalls)];
> -		regs->regs[4] = syscall_fn(regs->orig_a0, regs->regs[5], regs->regs[6],
> -					   regs->regs[7], regs->regs[8], regs->regs[9]);
> +	if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &nr))) {
> +		if (nr < NR_syscalls) {
> +			syscall_fn = sys_call_table[array_index_nospec(nr, NR_syscalls)];
> +			regs->regs[4] = syscall_fn(regs->orig_a0, regs->regs[5], regs->regs[6],
> +						   regs->regs[7], regs->regs[8], regs->regs[9]);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(struc
>  	long ret;
>  	syscall_fn f;
>  
> -	r0 = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, r0);
> +	if (unlikely(!syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &r0)))
> +		return syscall_get_error(current, regs);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls)) {
>  		if (unlikely(trap_is_unsupported_scv(regs))) {
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -332,13 +332,12 @@ void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *reg
>  
>  		riscv_v_vstate_discard(regs);
>  
> -		syscall = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, syscall);
> -
> -		if (syscall >= 0 && syscall < NR_syscalls) {
> -			syscall = array_index_nospec(syscall, NR_syscalls);
> -			syscall_handler(regs, syscall);
> +		if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &syscall))) {
> +			if (syscall >= 0 && syscall < NR_syscalls) {
> +				syscall = array_index_nospec(syscall, NR_syscalls);
> +				syscall_handler(regs, syscall);
> +			}
>  		}
> -
>  		syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
>  	} else {
>  		irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_nmi_enter(regs);
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(ni_syscall)
>  void noinstr __do_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int per_trap)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr;
> +	bool permit;
>  
>  	enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs);
>  
> @@ -121,7 +122,9 @@ void noinstr __do_syscall(struct pt_regs
>  		regs->psw.addr = current->restart_block.arch_data;
>  		current->restart_block.arch_data = 1;
>  	}
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, nr);
> +
> +	permit = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, &nr);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * In the s390 ptrace ABI, both the syscall number and the return value
>  	 * use gpr2. However, userspace puts the syscall number either in the
> @@ -129,7 +132,7 @@ void noinstr __do_syscall(struct pt_regs
>  	 * work, the ptrace code sets PIF_SYSCALL_RET_SET, which is checked here
>  	 * and if set, the syscall will be skipped.
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(test_and_clear_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL_RET_SET)))
> +	if (unlikely(test_and_clear_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL_RET_SET) || !permit))
>  		goto out;
>  	regs->gprs[2] = -ENOSYS;
>  	if (likely(nr < NR_syscalls)) {
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,9 @@ static __always_inline bool int80_is_ext
>  	nr = syscall_32_enter(regs);
>  
>  	local_irq_enable();
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, nr);
> -	do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
> +
> +	if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, &nr)))
> +		do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
>  
>  	instrumentation_end();
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> @@ -223,8 +224,8 @@ DEFINE_FREDENTRY_RAW(int80_emulation)
>  	nr = syscall_32_enter(regs);
>  
>  	local_irq_enable();
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, nr);
> -	do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
> +	if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, &nr)))
> +		do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
>  
>  	instrumentation_end();
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> @@ -243,13 +244,13 @@ DEFINE_FREDENTRY_RAW(int80_emulation)
>  	 * orig_ax, the int return value truncates it. This matches
>  	 * the semantics of syscall_get_nr().
>  	 */
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, nr);
> -
> -	instrumentation_begin();
> +	if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &nr))) {
> +		instrumentation_begin();
>  
> -	do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
> +		do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
>  
> -	instrumentation_end();
> +		instrumentation_end();
> +	}
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
>  }
>  #endif /* !CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION */
> @@ -286,10 +287,8 @@ static noinstr bool __do_fast_syscall_32
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, nr);
> -
> -	/* Now this is just like a normal syscall. */
> -	do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
> +	if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(regs, &nr)))
> +		do_syscall_32_irqs_on(regs, nr);
>  
>  	instrumentation_end();
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
> @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ static __always_inline void do_syscall_x
>  /* Returns true to return using SYSRET, or false to use IRET */
>  __visible noinstr bool do_syscall_64(struct pt_regs *regs, long nr)
>  {
> -	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, nr);
> +	if (likely(syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack(regs, &nr))) {
> +		instrumentation_begin();
>  
> -	instrumentation_begin();
> +		if (!do_syscall_x64(regs, nr))
> +			do_syscall_x32(regs, nr);
>  
> -	if (!do_syscall_x64(regs, nr))
> -		do_syscall_x32(regs, nr);
> -
> -	instrumentation_end();
> +		instrumentation_end();
> +	}
>  	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
>  
>  	/*
> --- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
> +++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> @@ -111,16 +111,15 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trac
>   * @regs:	Pointer to currents pt_regs
>   * @syscall:	The syscall number
>   *
> - * Invoked from architecture specific syscall entry code with interrupts
> - * enabled after invoking enter_from_user_mode(), enabling interrupts and
> - * extra architecture specific work.
> + * Invoked from architecture specific syscall entry code with interrupts enabled
> + * after invoking enter_from_user_mode(), enabling interrupts and extra
> + * architecture specific work with the syscall return value preset to -ENOSYS.
>   *
> - * Returns: The original or a modified syscall number
> + * Returns: True if the syscall should be invoked, False otherwise.
>   *
> - * If the returned syscall number is -1 then the syscall should be
> - * skipped. In this case the caller may invoke syscall_set_error() or
> - * syscall_set_return_value() first.  If neither of those are called and -1
> - * is returned, then the syscall will fail with ENOSYS.
> + * If the return value is false, the caller must skip the syscall and leave the
> + * syscall return value unmodified as it might have been set by one of the entry
> + * work functions.
>   *
>   * It handles the following work items:
>   *
> @@ -128,19 +127,20 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trac
>   *     ptrace_report_syscall_permit_entry(), __seccomp_permit_syscall(), trace_sys_enter()
>   *  2) Invocation of audit_syscall_entry()
>   */
> -static __always_inline long syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall)
> +static __always_inline bool syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(struct pt_regs *regs, long *syscall)
>  {
>  	unsigned long work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->syscall_work);
>  
> -	if (work & SYSCALL_WORK_ENTER) {
> -		if (!syscall_trace_enter(regs, work, syscall))
> -			return -1L;
> +	if (!(work & SYSCALL_WORK_ENTER))
> +		return true;
>  
> -		/* Reread the syscall number as it might have been modified */
> -		syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
> -	}
> +	if (unlikely(!syscall_trace_enter(regs, work, *syscall)))
> +		return false;
>  
> -	return syscall;
> +	/* Reread the syscall number as it might have been modified */
> +	*syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  /**


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-12 21:25 [patch 0/4] entry: Rework syscall skip logic Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-12 21:25 ` [patch 1/4] entry: Rework syscall_audit_enter() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-13  1:33   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-14 15:23   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-12 21:25 ` [patch 2/4] entry: Rework trace_syscall_enter() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-13  1:36   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-14 15:28   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-12 21:25 ` [patch 3/4] entry: Make return type of syscall_trace_enter() bool Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-13  1:40   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-14 15:41   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-12 21:25 ` [patch 4/4] entry, treewide: Make syscall_enter_from_user_mode[_work]() indicate syscall execution Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-13  8:44   ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-13 17:00     ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-13 22:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-14  7:29       ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-14  8:40         ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-14 18:57   ` Radu Rendec [this message]
2026-07-14 12:27 ` [patch 0/4] entry: Rework syscall skip logic Michal Suchánek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e35a11d2bd1a8dfa6c1b8d67fe2940c3fd507596.camel@rendec.net \
    --to=radu@rendec.net \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox