From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041C4679F1 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 02:58:27 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9EDE1664710B26419A57B21CBCBB8D0B01950175@XY01EX01.xy01.xyratex.com> References: <9EDE1664710B26419A57B21CBCBB8D0B01950175@XY01EX01.xy01.xyratex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 11:58:23 -0500 To: "Kostantinos Baliotis" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc 83xx immap_t question List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 9, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Kostantinos Baliotis wrote: > Hi folks, > > =A0 > > I=92m trying to port a custom driver to mpc8343E processor (a = relatively=20 > new one). I would be grateful if someone could point me out some links=20= > with specific patches, sources (or if it is possible the appropriate=20= > cross compile tool chain) for this target CPU. It uses a 603 based core so any standard PPC cross compiler should be=20 fine. > At this stage my main concern is if this new freescale=20 > embedded=A0processor supports the immap_t structure (known from the = good=20 > old mpc860). Not exactly sure what you are mean here. However, there are not any=20 plans to create master immap_t structures anymore. > I should mention that I=92m using a 2.4 Linux kernel at the moment. 2.6 has basic support for 834x in 2.6.12-rc4. - kumar=