From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Add uli1575 pci-bridge sector to MPC8641HPCN dts file.
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e72c7789d673e340d4a7feed22e535de@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HurPt-0002EP-It@jdl.com>
> I think this is an example of Early Days Misunderstanding Creep.
Is that the official name? :-)
> It was likely one of the very first attempts to write the file for
> any FSL embedded part, and as such, it was probably not so good.
But it also probably worked just fine, given all the
big fat workarounds in the Linux tree parsing code,
which are applied on *all* boards -- this will have
to change sooner or later, just like you don't run
all PCI quirks on all boards: it simply doesn't scale
and the side effects make everything impossible to
understand. In almost all cases, simply fixing the
device tree (Linux' runtime copy, anyway) in some
pre-processing pass is conceptually a much simpler
solution as well.
> Likely, it could use some cleanup. Patches and suggestions welcome.
I rather just wait until things break and then
deprecate (and later remove) support for those
boards. Unless the respective maintainers for
those boards fix things up, all is fine then
of course ;-)
Slightly more seriously -- since there are so
many DTS files, and their number grows real fast;
and since they are non-modular, and mostly copy-
and-paste; most fixes have to be made to lots
of separate DTS files. And that is something
no one can do, since no one can *test* those fixes,
since you need the hardware to do that.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-03 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-01 17:48 [PATCH 2/8] Add uli1575 pci-bridge sector to MPC8641HPCN dts file Jon Loeliger
2007-06-01 18:58 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-01 21:45 ` Wade Farnsworth
2007-06-02 8:22 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-02 8:53 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-02 9:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-02 19:53 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-02 20:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-03 7:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 8:33 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-03 8:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 9:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-03 10:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 10:10 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-03 11:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 12:43 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-03 14:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 18:20 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-03 18:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 9:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-03 9:59 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 14:50 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-06-03 17:27 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-06-04 20:27 ` Andy Fleming
2007-06-04 22:31 ` Randy Vinson
2007-06-05 19:16 ` Andy Fleming
2007-06-05 20:28 ` Randy Vinson
2007-06-06 7:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-07 16:21 ` Andy Fleming
2007-06-07 16:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-07 22:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-08 8:29 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-08 8:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-05 6:05 ` Zang Roy-r61911
2007-06-02 23:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-02 23:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-03 8:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-06-04 18:50 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-06-04 19:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-01 23:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-01 23:36 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-06-02 0:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-02 8:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-02 16:04 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-06-02 20:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-02 23:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-03 7:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-04 0:16 ` Olof Johansson
2007-06-04 8:18 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-02 8:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-02 23:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-03 0:13 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-03 7:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-03 7:53 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-06-04 18:49 ` Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e72c7789d673e340d4a7feed22e535de@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jdl@jdl.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).