From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
To: "Allen Curtis" <acurtis@onz.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: cpm2_devices.c
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:53:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e763199be1cca62d14cf4d0011b5f6e0@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8a775fb36a415f9b45ed713e4c63caa@onz.com>
> So have we answered your question regarding the inclusion of DMA and
> CPM in the platform_device array? If I am reading this correctly, all
> the individual CPM "objects" should be defined in the device structure
> with their physical address location defined. The complete IMMAP
> structure can then be constructed from these objects if required.
Actually, I dont feel that anyone has given a reason why or how they
would use CPM, DMA, SI1, SI2 if they were platform devices.
> Is it possible to add some flags to the IORESOURCE information to
> address the differences in SCC structures between processor types?
> Perhaps something like this could be used to apply the correct
> structure cast in the device driver. Just a thought...
I envisioned this being a field in the platform_data structures for the
devices.
- kumar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-16 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-14 18:18 RFC: cpm2_devices.c Allen Curtis
2005-06-15 3:35 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 3:57 ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-15 4:13 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 4:41 ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-15 14:24 ` Jason McMullan
2005-06-15 15:06 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 17:48 ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-15 18:05 ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-15 14:29 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 14:30 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-16 15:12 ` Dan Malek
2005-06-16 15:33 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-16 15:42 ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-16 15:53 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2005-06-16 16:39 ` Allen Curtis
2005-06-16 19:33 ` Dan Malek
2005-06-15 7:55 ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-15 14:25 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 14:33 ` Jason McMullan
2005-06-15 15:01 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 15:31 ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-15 15:41 ` Kumar Gala
2005-06-15 16:07 ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-06-16 6:42 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-06-16 9:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-06-16 15:02 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e763199be1cca62d14cf4d0011b5f6e0@freescale.com \
--to=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=acurtis@onz.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).