From: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com,
kjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/perf: Fix branch_filter support for multiple filters in powerpc
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:02:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea4db5b9-ac85-ada0-5940-23255b4106da@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220913115546.36179-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2783 bytes --]
On 9/13/22 5:25 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> For PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK sample type, different branch_sample_type
> ie branch filters are supported. The branch filters are requested via
> event attribute "branch_sample_type". Multiple branch filters can be
> passed in event attribute.
>
> Example:
> perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,ind_call true
>
> Powerpc does not support having multiple branch filters at
> sametime. In powerpc, branch filters for branch stack sampling
> is set via MMCRA IFM bits [32:33]. But currently when requesting
> for multiple filter types, the "perf record" command does not
> report any error.
>
> Example:
> perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,save_type true
> perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,ind_call true
>
> The "bhrb_filter_map" function in PMU driver code does the
> validity check for supported branch filters. But this check
> is done for single filter. Hence "perf record" will proceed
> here without reporting any error.
>
> Fix power_pmu_event_init to return EOPNOTSUPP when multiple
> branch filters are requested in the event attr.
>
> After the fix:
> perf record --branch-filter any,ind_call -- ls
> Error:
> cycles: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts.
> Try 'perf stat'
>
> Reported-by: Disha Goel<disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan<maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel<disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 13919eb96931..2c2d235cb8d8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -2131,6 +2131,21 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
> u64 bhrb_filter = -1;
>
> + /*
> + * powerpc does not support having multiple branch filters
> + * at sametime. Branch filters are set via MMCRA IFM[32:33]
> + * bits for power8 and above. Return EOPNOTSUPP when multiple
> + * branch filters are requested in the event attr.
> + *
> + * When opening event via perf_event_open, branch_sample_type
> + * gets adjusted in perf_copy_attr function. Kernel will
> + * automatically adjust the branch_sample_type based on the
> + * event modifier settings to include PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL.
> + * Hence drop the check for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL.
> + */
> + if (hweight64(event->attr.branch_sample_type & ~PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL) > 1)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> if (ppmu->bhrb_filter_map)
> bhrb_filter = ppmu->bhrb_filter_map(
> event->attr.branch_sample_type);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3548 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-16 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 11:55 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/perf: Fix branch_filter support for multiple filters in powerpc Athira Rajeev
2022-09-13 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] tools/perf/tests: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter Athira Rajeev
2022-09-16 13:06 ` kajoljain
2022-09-13 11:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Update the bhrb filter sampling test to test for multiple branch filters Athira Rajeev
2022-09-16 13:07 ` kajoljain
2022-09-16 11:32 ` Disha Goel [this message]
2022-09-16 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/perf: Fix branch_filter support for multiple filters in powerpc kajoljain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea4db5b9-ac85-ada0-5940-23255b4106da@linux.ibm.com \
--to=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).