* Why are CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, and CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT not defined for PowerPC?
@ 2007-11-28 19:56 Timur Tabi
2007-11-28 21:36 ` Tim Pepper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2007-11-28 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
These three Kconfig options:
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
Are not defined for ppc or powerpc, but they are defined for several other
architectures. I'm trying to debug some semaphore locks in ALSA, and these
defines are necessary to enable some other Kconfig features.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why are CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, and CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT not defined for PowerPC?
2007-11-28 19:56 Why are CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, and CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT not defined for PowerPC? Timur Tabi
@ 2007-11-28 21:36 ` Tim Pepper
2007-11-28 21:41 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Pepper @ 2007-11-28 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Nov 28, 2007 11:56 AM, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> wrote:
> These three Kconfig options:
>
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
> CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
> CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
>
> Are not defined for ppc or powerpc, but they are defined for several other
> architectures. I'm trying to debug some semaphore locks in ALSA, and these
> defines are necessary to enable some other Kconfig features.
These work for me, but I don't think they're finalised yet so your
mileage may vary:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=14171
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=14172
Tim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why are CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, and CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT not defined for PowerPC?
2007-11-28 21:36 ` Tim Pepper
@ 2007-11-28 21:41 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2007-11-28 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Pepper; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Timur Tabi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 358 bytes --]
> These work for me, but I don't think they're finalised yet so your
> mileage may vary:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=14171
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=14172
FWIW, the second one doesn't work on my quad G5 but I have a version
that works... Haven't figured out yet what's wrong with this one.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-28 21:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-28 19:56 Why are CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, and CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT not defined for PowerPC? Timur Tabi
2007-11-28 21:36 ` Tim Pepper
2007-11-28 21:41 ` Johannes Berg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).