From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, <msuchanek@suse.de>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
<guohanjun@huawei.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre.gondois@arm.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Nysal Jan K.A. <nysal@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] Support SMT control on arm64
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:16:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec04a084-0e01-afe3-6836-ed33615926ab@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04c9757c-98e9-4c5d-9759-8a9ac9d6a803@linux.ibm.com>
On 2024/12/26 20:28, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>
>
> On 12/26/24 17:20, Yicong Yang wrote:
>> On 2024/12/26 17:23, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/20/24 13:23, Yicong Yang wrote:
>>>> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
>>>>
>>>> The core CPU control framework supports runtime SMT control which
>>>> is not yet supported on arm64. Besides the general vulnerabilities
>>>> concerns we want this runtime control on our arm64 server for:
>>>>
>>>> - better single CPU performance in some cases
>>>> - saving overall power consumption
>>>>
>>>
>>> EAS is disabled when SMT is present.
>>> I am curious to know how power saving happens here.
>>
>> EAS shouldn't work on non-asymmetic systems, so it's not the case here.
>
> Ok. so this is a symmetric system then?
yes, symmetric.
>
>> System wide power consumption comes down from the CPU offlining here.
>>
>
> Ok. So SMT is enabled by default and then at runtime disable it to save power by off-lining the sibling threads?
>
yes.
>
> Note: When enabling SMT, current behavior differs when a core is fully offline on different archs. You may want to see which is behavior you need in that case. i.e either online or skip.
>
> PowerPC change where we are skipping a fully offline core.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240731030126.956210-1-nysal@linux.ibm.com/
>
Thanks for the information! Currently it's implemented as online and no special need for skip. We may need further
support if skip is required in the future, currently for GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY an offline CPU's thread sibling
only contains itself so there's no information for checking whether the whole core is offline or not.
Thanks.
>> Thanks.
>>
>>>
>>>> This patchset implements it in the following aspects:
>>>>
>>>> - Provides a default topology_is_primary_thread()
>>>> - support retrieve SMT thread number on OF based system
>>>> - support retrieve SMT thread number on ACPI based system
>>>> - select HOTPLUG_SMT for arm64
>>>>
>>>> Tests has been done on our ACPI based arm64 server and on ACPI/OF\
>>>> based QEMU VMs.
>>>>
>>> .
>
> .
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-27 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 7:53 [PATCH v10 0/4] Support SMT control on arm64 Yicong Yang
2024-12-20 7:53 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] cpu/SMT: Provide a default topology_is_primary_thread() Yicong Yang
2024-12-20 7:59 ` Yicong Yang
2024-12-23 16:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-24 12:15 ` Yicong Yang
2024-12-26 7:18 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-26 11:36 ` Yicong Yang
2024-12-20 7:53 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] arch_topology: Support SMT control for OF based system Yicong Yang
2024-12-23 16:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-24 12:23 ` Yicong Yang
2024-12-20 7:53 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] arm64: topology: Support SMT control on ACPI " Yicong Yang
2024-12-23 16:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-24 12:30 ` Yicong Yang
2024-12-20 7:53 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] arm64: Kconfig: Enable HOTPLUG_SMT Yicong Yang
2024-12-23 16:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-26 9:23 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] Support SMT control on arm64 Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-26 11:50 ` Yicong Yang
2024-12-26 12:28 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-27 7:16 ` Yicong Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec04a084-0e01-afe3-6836-ed33615926ab@huawei.com \
--to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=nysal@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).