From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC48C67871 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Myj2D2KqNz3cMl for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 21:43:16 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=anshuman.khandual@arm.com; receiver=) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Myj1Z45SKz2xvF for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 21:42:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9221FB; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.38.26] (unknown [10.163.38.26]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EF8D3F445; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:11:59 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 From: Anshuman Khandual Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Yicong Yang References: <20220921084302.43631-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> <20220921084302.43631-3-yangyicong@huawei.com> <168eac93-a6ee-0b2e-12bb-4222eff24561@arm.com> <8e391962-4e3a-5a56-64b4-78e8637e3b8c@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Nadav Amit , guojian@oppo.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, zhangshiming@oppo.com, lipeifeng@oppo.com, corbet@lwn.net, x86@kernel.org, Mel Gorman , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, realmz6@gmail.com, Barry Song , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, darren@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, xhao@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huzhanyuan@oppo.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 9/28/22 05:53, Barry Song wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:15 PM Yicong Yang wrote: >> >> On 2022/9/27 14:16, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> On 9/21/22 14:13, Yicong Yang wrote: >>>> +static inline bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm) >>>> +{ >>>> + /* for small systems with small number of CPUs, TLB shootdown is cheap */ >>>> + if (num_online_cpus() <= 4) >>> >>> It would be great to have some more inputs from others, whether 4 (which should >>> to be codified into a macro e.g ARM64_NR_CPU_DEFERRED_TLB, or something similar) >>> is optimal for an wide range of arm64 platforms. >>> > > I have tested it on a 4-cpus and 8-cpus machine. but i have no machine > with 5,6,7 > cores. > I saw improvement on 8-cpus machines and I found 4-cpus machines don't need > this patch. > > so it seems safe to have > if (num_online_cpus() < 8) > >> >> Do you prefer this macro to be static or make it configurable through kconfig then >> different platforms can make choice based on their own situations? It maybe hard to >> test on all the arm64 platforms. > > Maybe we can have this default enabled on machines with 8 and more cpus and > provide a tlbflush_batched = on or off to allow users enable or > disable it according > to their hardware and products. Similar example: rodata=on or off. No, sounds bit excessive. Kernel command line options should not be added for every possible run time switch options. > > Hi Anshuman, Will, Catalin, Andrew, > what do you think about this approach? > > BTW, haoxin mentioned another important user scenarios for tlb bach on arm64: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/393d6318-aa38-01ed-6ad8-f9eac89bf0fc@linux.alibaba.com/ > > I do believe we need it based on the expensive cost of tlb shootdown in arm64 > even by hardware broadcast. Alright, for now could we enable ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH selectively with CONFIG_EXPERT and for num_online_cpus() > 8 ?