From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F91DDE1F for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:44:52 +1100 (EST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so192736qwe.15 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:44:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: timur.tabi@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <49B06197.8010007@freescale.com> References: <1236295403-11954-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <49B06197.8010007@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:44:50 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: clean up ssi.txt, add definition for fsl, ssi-asynchronous From: Timur Tabi To: Scott Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > Does the above mean "SRCK, STCK, SRFS, and STFS must all be connected to the > same clock", or does it mean "SRCK must be connected to the same clock as > STCK, and SRFS must be connected to the same clock as STFS"? The latter. I'll reword it. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale