From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5445DDF86 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:03:40 +1000 (EST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so219592qwe.15 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:03:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: timur.tabi@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <49EF9B50.7010904@freescale.com> References: <49EF7B11.2000006@freescale.com> <49EF7B1C.2080105@freescale.com> <282847E1-AE1A-44EF-9D18-AF2884105FA5@kernel.crashing.org> <49EF8E3A.4060304@freescale.com> <5D0145E3-0A98-429E-8D53-1A8DF4216462@kernel.crashing.org> <49EF9B50.7010904@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:03:39 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: removing get_immrbase()?? From: Timur Tabi To: Scott Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Linuxppc-dev Development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > All I'm asking is that we treat a mandatory dts upgrade as seriously as a > mandatory firmware upgrade. I agree with this statement 100%. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale