From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldur.buserror.net (baldur.buserror.net [165.227.176.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42FHds2V7MzF3HZ for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:26:24 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: From: Scott Wood To: andy.tang@nxp.com Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:24:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180911021224.30558-1-andy.tang@nxp.com> References: <20180911021224.30558-1-andy.tang@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc85xx: fix issues in clock node List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 10:12 +0800, andy.tang@nxp.com wrote: > From: Yuantian Tang > > The compatible string is not correct in the clock node. > The clocks property refers to the wrong node too. > This patch is to fix them. > > Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1023si-post.dtsi | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1023si-post.dtsi > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1023si-post.dtsi > index 4908af5..763caf4 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1023si-post.dtsi > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1023si-post.dtsi > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ > mux0: mux0@0 { > #clock-cells = <0>; > reg = <0x0 4>; > - compatible = "fsl,core-mux-clock"; > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-core-mux-2.0"; > clocks = <&pll0 0>, <&pll0 1>; > clock-names = "pll0_0", "pll0_1"; > clock-output-names = "cmux0"; > @@ -356,9 +356,9 @@ > mux1: mux1@20 { > #clock-cells = <0>; > reg = <0x20 4>; > - compatible = "fsl,core-mux-clock"; > - clocks = <&pll0 0>, <&pll0 1>; > - clock-names = "pll0_0", "pll0_1"; > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-core-mux-2.0"; > + clocks = <&pll1 0>, <&pll1 1>; > + clock-names = "pll1_0", "pll1_1"; > clock-output-names = "cmux1"; > }; > }; These are the legacy nodes. Why not just remove them instead of fixing them? Now that the cpufreq driver is fixed we could get rid of the legacy nodes for all the chips. -Scott